This is one of those problems that can be calculated exactly. What is missing is the impedance of the amplifier so that the noise power can be calculated. If you wanted to do that, as seen at http://www.ecircuitcenter.com/Circuits/Noise/Noise_Analysis/res_noise.htm
you would also have to know the bandwidth of the amplifier. The assumptions of the other answers make assumptions that with a 1mW signal input, the noise of a resistor, even a high value, and a wide bandwidth, the resistor equivalent power is insignificant. This makes the amplifier output 10 dB above the input + an insignificant amount of noise. The 20 dB s/n again is insignificant. It tells you that there is 20 dB less (1/100 power) at the input from the noise of the input signal.
Hope this helps.
2006-10-02 06:45:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Joseph G 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
The previous answer is correct, the output power is 10 dB more than the input power. Convert it back to mW:
10 dBm = 10 LOG (x/1 mW)
x = 10 mW
The noise figure or signal-to-noise ratio of the amplifier is irrelevant for finding the output power of the amplifier. Only compression or distortion due to saturation could influence the true output power.
2006-10-01 17:35:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by SkyWayGuy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Your input power is 0 dbm, and the gain is 10 db, so the output power is 10 dbm, plus a tiny amount of noise. The noise level is negligable.
2006-10-01 09:04:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by cosmo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
yeah, some thing is conceivable in spite of the indisputable fact that it really is extremely worth questioning about. electric powered engineering is an truly wide container presently (IEEE, the institute for electric powered and digital engineers, is the biggest specialist employer contained in the international and electric powered engineers would properly artwork in better diverse fields than the different career) ... so, searching on what you opt for to finally end up doing in life, you probable can do it with an EE degree. The question is, are you able to leap although the ring (coursework) needed to get there ... or is there a better suited course to the position you opt for to bypass. the tutorial portion of the technique is better probable than no longer going to placed you although a honest volume of physics. Are you possibly better attracted to computing device engineering? regularly that allow you to to circumvent extremely some the better physics intensive classes. electric powered engineering does require a lifelike volume of physics and, at the same time as no longer all of it includes "physics" as such, maximum calls for extremely some an same mission fixing skills and mathematics, the excuses human beings have a tendency to be good at both or good at neither. maximum engineering is way less precis and not in any respect as deep as organic technology yet i imagine it really is honest to call engineering, highly electric powered, "utilized physics". on the middle of it, physics is the pursuit of understanding and understanding for his or her own sake, at the same time as engineering objectives to remedy a lifelike complications, i.e. make some thing that someone will purchase. the freshman "physics 100 and one" classes are frequently used to weed out students from engineering ... because, like it or no longer, you ought to be able to do those or you'll right now finally end up in worry once you get to the middle engineering classes good success!!
2016-11-25 20:59:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
complicated issue. look into using search engines like google. it could help!
2014-11-04 14:31:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by jason 3
·
0⤊
0⤋