Good start on the thinking. Keep at it. While there are lots of elements to this dialogue, here's what I've put together:
First, you have to define the term "God." The problem with most theists is that this term is a moving target.
In addition, because there is no evidence either for or against the existence of God, you cannot use deductive logic (a+b=c; therefore c-b=a). You can only reach a conclusion by inductive reasoning using the balance of evidence (90% of A is also B; C is B, so the chances are 90% that C is also A).
I will assert (and others may shoot this down) that the only RELEVANT definition of God states that he intervenes to circumvent natural laws.
If God circumvents natural laws, then it is impossible to understand natural laws. All scientific findings would have to include the stipulation, "it is also possible that these results are an act of God, a miracle, thereby making our research meaningless."
However, since we have been able to expand our knowledge of natural laws (evidenced by every appliance in your kitchen), the scientific method works in this discovery. And the likely conclusion is that God, at least the intervening kind, does not exist.
Additionally, if God is defined as all loving, all powerful, and all knowing, then it is impossible to explain suffering. Either God is not all loving (he acts sadistically), not all powerful (he cannot prevent suffering), or not all knowing (he created suffering by mistake because he didn't know the consequences of his actions).
If God is less than these and/or does not intervene in our existence, then he is either non-existent or irrelevant. The classic argument is that I cannot prove that a china teapot is orbiting the sun directly across from the earth's orbit. But while I cannot prove this is not true, the evidence against it is compelling.
The evidence against God is equally compelling, and while it is not possible to prove beyond any doubt, it makes more sense to live your life as if there were not God.
It is more compelling to me that humans have invented God to reflect the thoughts of the ruling powers in a particular time. Because humans are always looking for reasons, when none are found, it was the natural inclination to declare the cause to be "God" (or gods). As the faith grew, miracles and laws have been ascribed to this Divinity, and an orthodoxy grows up around it.
Successful religions over the long run also are accompanied by some level of economic well-being to the populace. Unsuccessful ones are seen as false because they don't lead to improved lives.
Now it seems unhelpful to believe in such superstition. The only matters that aid in our ongoing well being are work, location, health, sustenance, and pure, blind luck.
So no, I believe God does not exist. And you know what? It's okay if you do believe God exists.
2006-10-01 07:49:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no proof, sweetie. The bible was written by men. I believe in God, I do not believe in religions that claim to be the only way to God. Good luck on finding what is right for you. Questioning is good, thinking for yourself is mandatory.
2006-10-01 07:38:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i won't be able to purpose to teach that, a similar as you'll not favor to teach that God does exist via actual shown actuality which will deny the favor for faith. even with the indisputable fact that i provide help to understand ways I arrived on the right. i develop into non secular as a young person, and performance consistently been interested by religions, mythology and technology; i develop right into a non secular, practise Catholic; I study the Bible, both historic and New Testaments and the Apocrypha, some events; develop into once taught about it in practise; and heard about it in church and from door-calling sects. I realised in mid-teenage that faith develop into depending upon no longer some thing even with the indisputable fact that itself, that technology defined nature satisfactorily without wanting supernatural beings, and that non secular beliefs were no particular to those of historic beliefs in gods and goddesses. when I first had doubts about my faith I idea that would want to be this develop into once a attempt of it, which develop into once an idea planted in my mind through those training us about our faith. So I made the difficulty to settle for it even extra so. even with the indisputable fact that the doubts got here again, and that i puzzled what might want to ensue if we took faith out of the equation; the sector and nature though made sense, so I said no purpose to get again into it. And my determining is that there is not any longer any theoretical or mathematical favor for a god or gods, and there is not any longer a valid evidence of it or them; so there is not any reason to sense. on the time this develop into tricky intellectually and emotionally (i develop right into a young person, in the right). That develop into once over 40 years in the past, and my destroy out from faith has freed me to include what technology has to present day, which I think about some distance extra conceivable than conception in the supernatural, and is the nearest we may be able to get to the reality about how nature and the universe paintings. i have felt a sense of freedom ever since the, and am chuffed and at peace with this. and that i have discovered the humility to admit that I truly do no longer understand the best deal, fairly than overlaying this through way of invoking a deity. I though have an interest in religions, mythology, folklore and appropriate topics, and am in touch that folk nevertheless think in concerns that to me are evidently in simple terms now no longer actual.
2016-12-04 02:37:28
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
god is eternal not govern by time try to look at it more spiritually than physically your searching to hard for a physical proof. When your Hungary do you believe your Hungary or do you know your hungry. just because you cant see it or touch it doesn't mean your hunger does not exist
2006-10-01 07:43:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anthony S 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Proof that God exist.
When you look at a building, how do you know there was a builder? You haven't seen the builder, or heard him or touched him. But, you know there is a builder because the building is proof that there was a builder. You don't need faith, just eyes that can see and a brain that works.
What about a painting? How do you know there was a painter? Well, the painting is proof that there was a painter. You couldn't ask for better proof that a painter exist. It doesn't take faith, just eyes that can see and a brain that works.
When you look at creation, how do we know there was a creator? Well, creation is proof enough that a creator exist. You couldn't ask for better proof of a creator than the creation itself. It doesn't take faith, just eyes that can see and a brain that works.
2006-10-01 07:38:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jason M 5
·
0⤊
4⤋
God is love,because the greatest proof that God exist is you and me and this beautiful planet that we live on,and don't forget about the many miracles that God is doing each and everyday,God rescue and save people,and does mighty miracles in heaven and here on earth,so yes there is a true and living God,Daniel 6-27.
2006-10-01 07:38:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by donangelo 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
There are philosophical arguments and circumstantial evidence but no solid proof. It remains firmly in the realm of belief.
2006-10-01 07:33:39
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am a Christian, and I believe that Faith is the belief in things NOT SEEN. Just because I can't see it, don't mean that it don't exist. For an example, air, I can't see it, I can't touch it, but I know it's there.
2006-10-01 07:33:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Bryan M 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Not in this life. You have to choose for yourself what philosophies to embrace. It depends on what is most comfortable, comforting, logical or what ever standard you pick. You will find yourself with wonderings all of this lifetime. That is where Faith comes in.
2006-10-01 08:20:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by June smiles 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
If there were physical, tangible proof of God, He wouldn't be much of a God, would He?
Think about it.....
2006-10-01 07:52:49
·
answer #10
·
answered by David T 2
·
1⤊
1⤋