Considering cost and violent back lash from the invaders, to prevent mindless rioting, in which American militias will be used only as a peace keeping force. Because of the false message our countries leaders have sent I don't think these people should be harmed unless they take an agressive stance. I think they are confused into thinking the majority of Americans will not do whatever neccessary to enforce immigration law and protect their families because of a small percentage of libberals and our laxxed Gov. avoiding this issue.
2006-10-01 04:52:04 · 14 answers · asked by regulator 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I think this next year is going to see more people moving home, and you don't need a militia, you need to fill out a ballot form. When your city, and your county, go to the statehouse and everyone's kind of saying the same thing on the issue, that's called 'a consensus', and when good legislation gets passed that results in immigration laws being properly and effectively and fairly enforced, and employers getting fined for breaking the law,
you'll have people moving back home, and setting up shop in Mexico, which is good for us, it's good for them, and everybody's happy. Then, later on, when things are cleaned up a little, then we work on having a guest worker program, and I think that should go BOTH ways, because it wouldn't hurt things at all to have people from our country to go work in their country either.
That's like, partnership, cooperation, that kind of thing, and it'd help move things along in terms of progress in Mexico, which is what they desperately need and what this whole mess is really about. Good policies and good fences make good neighbors.
2006-10-01 05:20:58 · answer #1 · answered by gokart121 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the first few steps should be cutting off their source of income. Really fine the employer’s hiring illegal immigrants. I would not be opposed to the “3 strikes your out rule” on employer’s. If they are fined a 3rd time for hiring an illegal immigrant, close the business (may be drastic, but something along those lines). Cut off ANY welfare benefit to ANY illegal immigrant, these are not their benefit to receive in the first place. With something like this in place, many will return home on their own just the way the came. Oh no more anchor babies. If you are not here legally, then your child is not a US Citizen.
2006-10-01 05:16:11 · answer #2 · answered by 75160 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Homeland Security estimates there will be 302,000 MORE illegals brought into our state and local jails this year than would usually be deported under policies in effect before this year. These people don't even take 'finding' or dawn raids, or any of that. Until the rate is high enough that ALL of these 'twice illegal' are deported, I think we know that they aren't really trying.
I think gang members should be routinely asked for proof of citizenship and be deported if they don't have it, as well.
2006-10-01 05:36:42 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Considering how long this has been going on, it should be done as quickly and peacefully as possible. There's no doubt that the mass of illegals would and may react with violence. They have no respect for this country or it's laws. "They do all the work, we can't survive without them." So just show arms, keep them in check and work them right out the back door. Not all of them deserve to go, but either they register as an illegal or they go back with gps chips in their necks. They really want to keep coming back then we put them to work in rehabilitation farms. Where they can learn English and work for their education.
2006-10-01 05:07:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
they are taking an aggressive stance...they are aggressively abusing our social services!
We should 1st cut-off all welfare, in any form, then start deporting 500,000 per month - no need to have deportation hearings they are not Americans & do not have the right to clog our judicial system...after about 90 days with no welfare there will be many less to deport!
2006-10-01 05:28:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we should go after business that hire illegals hard and if needed bring in more "legal" labor for them to hire. However, the new "legal" labor should not include any criminal already here. We should also have tough limitations on ALL welfare benefits for illegals.
If we do this they will go back on their own because there will be nothing for them here.
2006-10-01 05:08:17 · answer #6 · answered by remmo16 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine New Zealand because of their very undesirable effect of try cricket. presently England has defeated New Zealand very badly also their performance compared to good now. So, i imagine New Zealand is the most below rated try cricket crew contained in the international or i imagine South Africa is the most effective try cricket crew contained in the international.
2016-11-25 20:31:12 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ask any Native American
2006-10-01 04:57:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
As many as we find and where ver we find them...
We should set up a line and just feed all we find though the chain and get rid of the illegals as fast and as many as we can and ASAP.
No set numbers just as many as we can round up.
2006-10-01 05:25:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
practical rate??? 1,000,000 per day!!!! Get rid of the illegal immigrants!!! If they come here legally, cool. But otherwise, F**k 'em.
2006-10-01 05:00:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋