English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

5 answers

Hi, this doesn't exist, "plural of singular" and "singular of plural" . They remain as they are originally, singular= one, only; and plural= many, more than one. Some words are just like that in the English language, they cannot be adjusted, for example, there is no difference between the singular and plural mode of teh word "fish", fish is singular and plural in itself, "fishes" does not exist. Same thing with "money" the word "money" is both singular and plural at the same time, we don't say "moneys". Same goes for the word "mail", no difference between singular and plural.

2006-10-01 04:40:36 · answer #1 · answered by mermaid199 3 · 0 0

Very funny. Singulars. Plural is already single.

2006-10-01 04:28:40 · answer #2 · answered by Barkley Hound 7 · 0 0

There are 2 main definitions for "singular" and "plural" as they can both be adjectives or nouns. If you're taking the terms "singular" and "plural" as adjectives, then it does not make sense to quantify them. However, if you're using "singular" and "plural" as nouns, then the plural of "singular" is "singulars" ("singles" shall also suffice) and the singular of "plural" is "plural"

2006-10-01 04:35:43 · answer #3 · answered by Cheese Face 2 · 0 0

There is no plural for both of these words. This means, that "plural" is as a word singular!

2006-10-01 04:32:06 · answer #4 · answered by corleone 6 · 0 0

singulars and pluri Good Luck! :)

2006-10-01 04:25:36 · answer #5 · answered by tysavage2001 6 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers