with/without her kid?
2006-09-30 16:42:04 · 9 answers · asked by gokart121 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Be a human being Gokart, mothers and children should not be seperated.
2006-09-30 17:05:53 · answer #1 · answered by Carol R 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
With, unless she is unfit--which I am beginning to wonder about.
To leave a child in the hands of anyone else could be worst. What animal does that-yet alone a human.
Again I am not sure about this women-she uses her child. This is Sad and pitiful.
Few people I truly dislike-she is becoming one of them.
2006-10-01 23:44:18 · answer #2 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
En pronto, without the anchor child. She might come up with another trick using the poor kid as a ploy.
2006-09-30 23:47:30 · answer #3 · answered by fanofkeanur 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Her choice as to with or without her kid. I'd ask what sort of mother would leave her child in another country without family, but I've already sized her up as the self-centered sort.
2006-09-30 23:48:00 · answer #4 · answered by DAR 7 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Send her back with her kid.
You know what I don't understand? Why is she famous for breaking our laws? People are treating her as if she is some sort of martyr.
2006-10-01 02:16:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
With or without deport her!! If she loves her son so much send him back too.
2006-09-30 23:46:25 · answer #6 · answered by Chocolate Bunt 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋
send her back. with the kid. if she's going to be here then let her do it legally.
2006-10-01 00:50:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
i say with, the damn anchor baby should not have the rights since she is showing that is the only reason she had him, send them both back
2006-09-30 23:48:10 · answer #8 · answered by NoBama For Me 2 · 5⤊ 1⤋
with....we've already got too many "pity" cases here!
besides, why is it some people can get away w/ murder while the rest of us have to sit here paying their way??
2006-09-30 23:44:39 · answer #9 · answered by sunshine 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋