And how do you think America will react if he were to interfere with her SECOND deportation after being convicted of social security fraud?
"Saul will be accompanied by several immigration activists as well as by Congressman Luis Guitterez to Washington DC. The group plans to address the president on Tuesday."
I really feel sorry for the kid, and I think the mother should be handling this very differently, for his sake.
http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=local&id=4615520
What do you think?
2006-09-30 16:16:09 · 14 answers · asked by DAR 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
I agree with you....She should NOT use her son as a pawn....Its disgusting...
2006-09-30 16:18:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
I have many thoughts on this, and for once I actually like AngelaR's answer
And I can almost guarantee if he meets up with this kid his ratings are going to drop. This woman has broken several laws has been deported and came back and wants to thumb her nose at the authorities!! Now she wants to send her child to see the President, to plead her case?!?! Am I the only one that finds this Infuriating, that our President is even going to go thru with this??!! You know it's all about the Hispanic vote, his PR wants him to look like he's sympathetic. This will most likely blow up in his face.
~add on~ Wouldn't this be a perfect time to storm the church and take her into custody?? We definitely won't have to hear about the bleeding hearts crying "foul" for arresting her in front of Saul. (you know they will)
2006-09-30 16:31:45 · answer #2 · answered by Hold em Rox 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Where is this woman with NO job, No husband, No legal status in this country, getting all the money it takes to cavort her child around the countryside in a desperate attempt to avoid lawful prosecution of her deportation order? That is what I would like to know.
I want to meet the president, What would I have to do to experience that.? I am a citizen also, & I have payed a lot more in taxes than some ADD afflicted anchor baby!
Damn these people make me mad enough to spit!
2006-09-30 16:32:37 · answer #3 · answered by Stands Alone 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
this poor little bot is seven years old, how does he know what to say to the president? his mother told him. what kind of a horrible mother scares her little child like this?
"I want President Bush to stop the raid and the deportation of my mom so she can stay with me," said Saul Arellano, Elvira's son."
obviously she did not bother to tell him that she could take him with her if she is deported! clearly he was born to be an anchor baby and continues to serve that purpose for her today. she should be ashamed of herself!
2006-10-01 03:20:09 · answer #4 · answered by thelogicalferret 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Bush already said he'll sign the border bill, I think it's flat-out evil that the lady is trying to use her kid as a political tool, it kind of shows how shameless people have gotten on this issue, using any angle possibly imaginable to try and gain some kind of legal status in our country. I hope Bush asks him which country he wants to grow up in, point-blank. I also hope the ICE ships that lady out on the first plane they can find, with a 20-year ban on trying to re-enter our country. THAT soap opera's gone on long enough....she should take her kid with her, and go home.
2006-09-30 16:19:02 · answer #5 · answered by gokart121 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
No one is stopping him from staying with his mom, he just needs to go back to Mexico with her. She is exploiting that child and it isn't fair to him. It's like sending the kid out to panhandle money for you.
As for the rest of the article? The "no match" letters? What these companies are doing is following the LAW. Why boycott? Boycott because they are trying to keep themselves out of trouble? Let the pro-illegals boycott, I'll just go to those places twice as much to help make up the difference.
2006-09-30 16:49:24 · answer #6 · answered by msuzyq 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Zoe; I accept as true with you whoeheartedly. She is taking section in this extremely smart, and look at were given to furnish her that. Why no longer rape the stupid US legal equipment a touch extra? A regulation favor to be surpassed REPEALING "Anchor toddlers" suitable to citizenship. they should be despatched again to their united states of foundation, alongside with their unlawful moms and dads. there's a technique for in search of legal citizenship, albeit a awful one in illegals eyes, even with the indisputable fact that it must be upheld so anybody realizes their perfect risk to stay right that is to fall in line..., Make sense? it might want to also remove all stressful circumstances to the equipment that stamp each and every illegals case as 'particular', or 'extenuating'. the U. S. could OUTLAW this unlawful invasion through legal challenge. attempt sneaking into Mexico and see what takes position to you! communicate about HYPOCRITES! Mexico is HYPOCRITICAL even as it contains their clinical care of illegals. Now that the Democrats are in skill, shall we see how undesirable THEY mishandle this concern. they could't 'F' issues up like the Republicans did, yet truth study, they truly aren't any extra perfect. because this mess is our own fault, in elementary words once a terrorist who develop into smuggled into this united states or sneaked in through Venuezuela legal archives, then you quite will see there'll be hell to pay. no one will take duty even with the indisputable fact that the borders will be sealed. We in simple terms ought to attend to work out even as the subsequent round of thousands sacrificed, (probable from Washington DC, or ny city) will be killed even with the indisputable fact that, effectively killing thousands extra and the finger pointing will commence, yet regrettably..., in elementary words THEN WILL THE BORDERS BE SEALED!
2016-12-04 02:09:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
for one, he has already spoeken through the courts and she has not got what she wanted so know she is going to cry wolf once more, the fact is she is illegal and ADD is not a disorder that america can only handle so if she wants her son that bad she can take him home with her, if not then she can pack her bags and leave without him, its her call.
2006-09-30 16:23:29 · answer #8 · answered by NoBama For Me 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think she's a pathetic B ITCH, for starters.. And involving an innocent child is even more disturbing. She should be deported. It doesn't matter whether her child is legal or not - she doesn't belong here.
2006-09-30 16:40:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Yep sending my son, there to meet the El Presedentia, and if I get my way Laura will need to take the back seat and I will be the First hoochey momma, of the United States.
Kinda shameful for me as well as the rest of the pro-illegal movement to hide behind a 7 year old boy, but we will do what ever we need to do, besides Bush is looking for a excuse to keep the illegals in the U.S., so he just might get what he is looking for.
However, if Bush does not change his mind, LaRaza has a child psychiatrist ready to train the boy to say " The president touched me here" as he points to a doll.
2006-09-30 16:27:23 · answer #10 · answered by Elvira Arellano 1 · 0⤊ 5⤋
It is a sad sad case of bad parenting. He should be taken away form his own mother who wont stop manipulating a child, not for the child's benefit but her own.
2006-09-30 16:27:37 · answer #11 · answered by fanofkeanur 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋