English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

and which of these two do you think would be the first to want to abolish freedom of religion from the constitution

2006-09-30 13:49:18 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

20 answers

Fisher is far more dangerous. She wants control. All Coulter wants is money.

2006-09-30 13:52:01 · answer #1 · answered by ? 7 · 1 1

If we had a free thinking society, neither of these women would be threats. Sadly, a large proportion of our society is incapable of rational thought, and so is easy prey for their brain washing.

Ann Coulter is the bigger threat since she has a larger audience.

This country is in another period like the McCarthy era. I can't wait for when we wake up and realize we were suckered into fearful, irrational behavior. If we don't wake up, then Osama Bin Laden has won.

2006-09-30 21:09:39 · answer #2 · answered by Jim L 5 · 0 0

now that ive found out who anne coulter and becky fisher are, i still am not sure who is a bigger threat. they are both pretty screwed up. i dont consider myself to be liberal, nor conservative. so, in coulter's view, im an idiot. lol ok, i can disregard coulter now.

fisher... heh, when i saw that she was a children's pastor, i remembered seeing a clip about her and her "church" online. all i could say was... oh... my... god.... those children have been brainwashed.

both coulter and fisher are threats, in my opinion. each one in her own little category.

2006-09-30 21:24:01 · answer #3 · answered by lostcause8436 3 · 0 0

Anne Coulter is a joke, so I'd have to go with Becky Fisher, whom I've never heard of. We should not renew her Oxygen Consumption contract.

2006-09-30 20:52:44 · answer #4 · answered by Billy W 3 · 0 1

Coulter

2006-09-30 20:50:34 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 0 2

I would hit that. (Anne Coulter) Just as long as I could kick her out of the bathroom stall without her clothes on into a crowded public place.

2006-09-30 20:53:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know who Fisher is, but Ann Coulter is not a detriment to a free thinking society.

2006-09-30 20:51:27 · answer #7 · answered by Speaking_Up 5 · 1 2

Ann Coulter. As a conservative, I feel embrassed by loonies like her. I wish she'd just die and go to hell already. She'd love to abolish freedom of religion and institute compulsory Christianity.

2006-09-30 20:52:22 · answer #8 · answered by Alucard 4 · 0 1

billions voted for the last American Idiot..er I mean Idol.. less than 10% of that voted in the last presidential election.. THAT is THE THREAT to a free thinking society.. did you know they were voting on making christianity the religion of STATE?.. They might have succeeded, but at least I raised hell with my Senators and Congressmen about it.. what did you do? or did you even know about that?

2006-09-30 20:54:10 · answer #9 · answered by TimeWastersInc 6 · 0 0

Neither they nor anyone I've heard or met has kept me from thinking freely and for myself. If fact, often people like them inspire people like us to revisit our own beliefs, inspiring thought and contemplation.

Sometimes the most controversial people are the greatest catalyst to preserving a free thinking society.

2006-09-30 21:00:05 · answer #10 · answered by dave 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers