English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean after all it is one of the most abundant resources on the earth.... shouldn't it be free of charge? Maybe that is why evian spelled backwards is naive.

2006-09-30 11:05:51 · 5 answers · asked by justmejb 1 in Environment

5 answers

Water should be free to all it comes from natural resources. its the add chemicals that we are paying for along with the little plastic bottle it comes with. we already pay for water that comes right to the house. I have drank it for years and I am still going. LOL

2006-10-01 16:24:45 · answer #1 · answered by mysticstargoddess 2 · 0 0

I have seen this joke before,
"Dihydrogen monoxide is colorless, odorless, tasteless, and kills uncounted thousands of people every year. Most of these deaths are caused by accidental inhalation of DHMO, but the dangers of dihydrogen monoxide do not end there.

Prolonged exposure to its solid form causes severe tissue damage. Symptoms of DHMO ingestion can include excessive sweating and urination, and possibly a bloated feeling, nausea, vomiting and body electrolyte imbalance. For those who have become dependent, DHMO withdrawal means certain death."..

2006-09-30 11:16:36 · answer #2 · answered by ♪ ♫ ☮ NYbron ☮ ♪ ♫ 6 · 0 0

Yes it should. Now excuse me while I sip on my Evian water. And for you information, the correct word is dihydrousmonoxide.

2006-09-30 15:01:02 · answer #3 · answered by Amphibolite 7 · 0 0

No, it shouldn't be banned from comercial sale, because it is just water. Simple H2O.

2006-09-30 11:25:37 · answer #4 · answered by lightsaber_tech 2 · 0 0

water ????

nahhh .... there's "good water" ...
and "not so good" water


if you had only swill to drink .. and had a cople bucks
with no other optiopn for drinking "safe", would it be
worth your dollars to buy the good stuff??

pobly "yes"

2006-09-30 11:10:50 · answer #5 · answered by atheistforthebirthofjesus 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers