If an Electric Airplane hit the Sears Tower and it collapsed?

Question

Would "ya'll" believe that it was a static discharge that ignited the diesel storage tanks in the basement, 100 stories down???

ROTFLMFAO

Hey Hayes Family. You are a ******* Slug! You call ME "Following the herd???!!!!!!!!!!!!" The biggest conspiracy theory EVER was one made up of PLASTIC boxcutters from some guy in the Afghan mountains that boarded 4 airliners. 7 of the 26 hijackers turned up ALIVE in the Middle East!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The USA lies to you pieces of **** so bad that they tell you to jump and you say how high. Hayes family. ha. I knew a Hayes and he was the coc_kiest piece of dung I've ever come in contact with...

Mark G. The vast majority of liars; you mean?

Answer 1

this is similar to the twin tower story!!!! we had to believe that the airplance caused the towers to collaps "VERTICALLY"... right?

Answer 2

Then it would be the fourth building in the history of skyscrapers to do that.(WTC 1 & 2 & 7 were the others).

HayesFamily - Quick note, the fuel from the planes is not an issue. The scientist at UL(Underwriters Laboratories) proved beyond a scientific doubt that it is impossible for the jet fuel to get hot enough to melt the particular quality of steel used in the towers.
I have a copy of this report.
Fact - The scientist that made these findings was asked by UL not to mention anything to the press and when he challenged that request he was fired.
There are many issues that don't add up and need to be answered......on a political note, why was over 100 million dollars spent investigating clintons BJ but only 14 million on the 9/11 commission report (it was originally 3 but the families protested and were disappointed at the 14 also)

Answer 3

You might try talking to the vast majority of engineers who have studied the issue. There are also lots of websites out there that explain the physics of 911 in a scientific way that do not rely on political dreams.

I would recommend this link for you. Demolition professionals analyze 911. They are much more familiar than web commentators.
http://www.implosionworld.com/Article-WTC%20STUDY%208-06%20w%20clarif%20as%20of%209-8-06%20.pdf

Answer 4

So you are an expert? How big is this air plane?
Is it packed with any explosives? (The jet fuel in the twin towers plane played a huge role.)
And where did you earn your degree in physics. You should have stated this. Your degree in engineering?
You should have stated this.
Where and when did you get the permission to view all of the data involved with the twin towers strike. You should tell us all.
I am of course going on the assumption that you are doubting the results of the experts that have looked at all of the data involved.

The Bush administration is a lot of things, some good some bad. But YOU have to be insane to think that they took the towers down.
Stop following the herd! Learn to think for yourself. I did!

Answer 5

Margaret I, I am trying to understand what you are trying to establish by asking such a question but haven't been able to yet. May be I am a little slow or maybe the question has little or no practical value.

Either way, even if someone were to answer this question (scientifically speaking) whom would it really help and what positives would come out of the answer?

Please help me understand this. Thank you.

Answer 6

If the airplane was powered by a rubber band, would that create a permanent anti-lightning rod?

Answer 7

It's a good thing the theorist are not running the country.
Not the brightest crayons in the box are they?

Answer 8

Maggie, you need to get a clue and then maybe someone will want to go out with you.