Some say He did, with Mary Magdelene. Nobody knows, because it's not important to the souls of men.
2006-09-30 07:59:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by arewethereyet 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
I guess God could do anything, but I'd think a uterus would have been helpful for Jesus to have a child...
; )
And the widowing issue wasn't such an issue since they didn't live much beyond 33 in those times.
2006-09-30 08:03:14
·
answer #2
·
answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I think it is likely that the man Jesus was married. He was a Jew and the custom of the time was arranged marriages at young ages. Who knows, the bible was corrupted by men with their own agenda and none of it is to be believed.
2006-09-30 08:02:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gorgeoustxwoman2013 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Have you not read,
The Holy Spirit came upon Mary, not God,,,
Jesus, does have children,
Because of his blood on the cross,
I'm a child of God.
Spirit and flesh,
two different things,
you wont get this.
Romans cp. 8 explanes it all.
2006-09-30 08:01:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by Faith Walker 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
who says he didn't? all we have are witten stories that we cannot prove are true or false. maybe jesus did, but that would make him look too human, so the church fathers decided to censor the books, just like they did other books...we will not know until we are meant to know. and no, it is not a sin, but rather a pleasure.
2006-09-30 08:05:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by minerva 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He could as he basically was a clone of Adam with all the same genetic material. It was not his purpose to have children and he knew it. He was there to fulfill the covenant of the sacrificial lamb.
2006-09-30 08:17:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
what good would it have done him to get married? so he could leave a widow and a small child alone at the age of 33? if he had a son, I'm pretty sure the clergy would have killed it.
he came to preach repentance, provide atonement, and go back up to heaven. that was it.
2006-09-30 08:00:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by cirque de lune 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
"Sin" should be stricken from the dictionary. There is no such thing. There is what we do and what we are. Sin is the church's way of maintaining their establishment.
2006-09-30 07:59:28
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eathernet 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
your missing the purpose, that was not what Christ came to earth for. If it was meant to have happened it would.
2006-09-30 08:00:16
·
answer #9
·
answered by K 5
·
0⤊
1⤋