2006-09-30 07:14:44 · 24 answers · asked by Stands Alone 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Nancy EFF, Your constitutionally guaranteed whine is drowning mine out, volume down please.
2006-09-30 07:27:01 · update #1
YES!!!!! The crap that took place yesterday, was some BS!!
And the little Posse thinks they can do whatever they want without repercussions!! (they know who they are, some even flat out was laughing about it, condoning it) Law Suit and criminal investigation needs to happen in this matter.
The POSSE and Ring LEADER think they are sooooo smart, but I'm letting you all know now, I see your games. I know who the players are. I hope you all go down, for this.
The Zoo Keeper needs to get back to his work station!!!
BTW Actual Laws were broken yesterday, I hope the Posse keeps that in mind, while looking over their shoulder!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This forum is supposed to be anonymous, what happened to that?? (I have my theories and ideas/hunches)
~add on~ Wonder why some on this forum want to act like they don't know what happened?? LOL Classic Criminal Hypocritical Denial. So Lame!!
~add on~ fox we can shorten it to C.C.H.D.
2006-09-30 07:30:32 · answer #1 · answered by Hold em Rox 6 · 5⤊ 2⤋
lots know to you yet i'm getting somewhat bored with the Emo questions now. each and every era has stable and undesirable song. i understand the song I enjoyed whilst i became an adolescent became particularly generally criticised. My component is, I hate Emo yet I care so little approximately it that i can't additionally be afflicted to speak approximately it anymore. some human beings do like it nevertheless, particular, they are not genuine song followers on the 2d in spite of the undeniable fact that it quite is probable a stronger stepping stone than say, N'Sync. It made me snicker once you reported 'it' places different peoples lives in possibility - considering you may desire to take your eyes off the line...
2016-10-18 06:26:54 · answer #2 · answered by avey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Yahoo is knowingly allowing an Employee of theirs to be giving out personal information--yes they could be liable. And the employee could be in trouble. And so could the receiver of information. If Yahoo is aware of the problem and takes no action-yes.
Keeping records of reports and names is a good step. As Yahoo does have certain rules they must abide by. And keep records of who you talk with at Yahoo.
That is up to some to decide if they want to pursue it.
Some things could be action suits--all business even private have rules they have to follow.
I know this as fact.
I am not sure what you feel is uncontitutional though. Abuse in what way?
2006-09-30 10:58:08 · answer #3 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 5⤊ 0⤋
You can't sue Yahoo! for "unconstitutional" behavior. Private businesses are not limited by the Constitution.
2006-09-30 07:22:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Not sure what unconstitutional abuse you're talking about...
2006-09-30 07:24:15 · answer #5 · answered by Angela Chen Shui 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Whose Constitution? This is an international site and I ain't American.
2006-09-30 07:58:44 · answer #6 · answered by Constant_Traveler 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
The constitution generally governs governmental action. Not private action.
2006-09-30 07:20:13 · answer #7 · answered by DAR 7 · 5⤊ 3⤋
What unconstitutional abuse?
2006-09-30 07:16:34 · answer #8 · answered by roberticvs 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Go for it...I think when you "Contact Yahoo" you are really sending an e-mail to a black hole. No one ever sees it again, reads it, or cares that it was sent.
2006-09-30 07:17:41 · answer #9 · answered by ? 6 · 8⤊ 1⤋
Dammitt I lay off this forum for about a month and actually join the real world and something happens.I swear someone should write up a blog to keep everyone posted about the things that go on in here,maybe title it " as the yahoo virtual world turns".Silly me I thought we were on here to debate in an "intelligent" (too bad can't underline that part) matter,not make it into a soap opera.Aww well so anyone care to fill me in on who hates who now,who's impersonating who and who stole who's id?
2006-09-30 08:08:13 · answer #10 · answered by Nexus K 4 · 3⤊ 6⤋