I don't. Here is why :
many true scientific advances have only testified to the accuracy of the Bible. Advances in science have disproved the theory of Spontaneous Generation and have supported the Biblical view that life can only come from pre-existing life (Genesis 1:12,24), as well as giving us the Laws of Thermodynamics (Genesis 2:1; Hebrews 1:10-12), and has revealed how much influence the mind has over the actions of the body (Mark 7:20-23). One writer said, "nothing that stops with science can be the whole truth." Science can develop more efficient ways to abort babies, but science can't answer the question, "Should we?" Science has developed painless ways to kill the elderly, but science can't answer the question, "Is it moral?" Science has enabled people to have sex change operations, but science can't answer the question, "Is it right?" One writer responded, "Science can only tell us what can be done; it can never answer the question whether it should be done. It can tell us that x number of people (or percentage) commit adultery; it cannot tell us whether they should." Actually the opposite to the above argument is true. Scientific advances have made belief in God more crucial than ever.
2006-09-30 03:53:47 · 10 answers · asked by heresyhunter@sbcglobal.net 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
That is why I don't buy into neoscience. Further, as a professional scientific instrument Metrologist I'd like to go on the record and state that Carbon dating is junk science.
Romans 1:21-23, "Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened. Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things."
Isn't it interesting that Paul wrote about Evolutionists?
2006-09-30 04:00:15 · answer #1 · answered by Bad Cosmo 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Well... trying to create the illusion that you had an original thought? Actually, your 'question' was copied-and-pasted from a 'Liars For Jesus' web site article, "Trying To Hide From God": http://www.ch-of-christ.beaverton.or.us/Hiding_From_God.htm
You should give appropriate references and credit when you lift other people's material like that... otherwise, people might get the impression that you are being deceitful, and giving the impression that the work is your own. If I were you, though, I wouldn't be to anxious to take credit for the tripe that your 'question' contained... it is full of lies, misconceptions, misrepresentations and logical fallacies that are only suitable for mollifying already-deluded believers, who don't know how to think for themselves, and placating their doubts. It has no persuasive value whatsoever with respect to influencing the minds of reasonable people.
2006-09-30 11:11:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Science is searching for truth and so is religion..
The ultimate in truth is God himself.
But till there are scientist or Religionist who think Science or religion is only for their satisfaction and enjoyment.. People will suffer.
But when both Science and Religion is used for service of God only.. then all suffering will be gone...
2006-09-30 12:53:00 · answer #3 · answered by Parsu 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm with devlsad - If life can only come from pre-existing life, then I guess that we have to accept that god is alive. If that is the case, then from what pre-existing life did god come? Oh, I'll bet it's that rock-hard, empirical answer, "Because god is all-powerful and has always been."
2006-09-30 11:02:26 · answer #4 · answered by Skeff 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Science is fact. Faith is a theory.
2006-09-30 10:59:34 · answer #5 · answered by S K 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The last time I checked God can't tell us whether something is 'moral' or 'right' either. Unless you two have been texting back and forth without my knowledge.
2006-09-30 10:59:10 · answer #6 · answered by Mr. Gray 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
please learn something about science before you post garbage like this.
you're just post-hoc, selectively interpreting parts of the bible to be consistent with science.
PS: the bible says that a bat is a bird and Pi = 3.0, so that makes your bible a scientific joke.
2006-09-30 10:56:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
No, because science has proven the existance of an Ultimate Observer.
"It's time to get wise."
2006-09-30 10:57:44 · answer #8 · answered by mindrizzle 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
What ever question you have, Buddhism can answer for you. If you really understand Buddhism, you don't need to ask those questions. Please give a try http://www.budsas.org/ebud/ebdha030.htm
2006-09-30 10:59:01 · answer #9 · answered by AAA 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
You'll have to do better than that to convince me
2006-09-30 10:58:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋