President attacked Iraq in the name of protecting this country , not as a reason to protect the name of Christ.
2006-09-29 17:31:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mike 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, Bush attacked Iraq in the name of Richard B. Cheney.
2006-09-29 17:40:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Jimmy Carter is the perfect U.S. president because John Kennedy, and doubtless the third best of the 20 th Century. the different president because Kennedy and between he and McKinley has represented almost complete evil and in almost no way the interests of ninety 9% of neither human beings nor human beings. All who disagree are brainwashed drones inured through the Matrix. this isn't SPARTA! - study about it.
2016-12-04 01:25:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt it, if Bush werre religious, there would be no Middle east right now, just a huge mass of uranium.
|President attacked Iraq in the name of protecting this country|
Protecting his country? From what? Imaginary Weapons of Mass Destruction? He attacked for oil.
2006-09-29 17:33:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Many wars and destruction have happened in the name of religion. These are among the most bloody and deadly. I don't believe that he thought of using God as an excuse or he probably would have.
2006-09-29 17:36:29
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He did not and Jesus wouldn't have accepted his prayer on that anyway.
G.W. attacked Iraq because ol' ****** Sadam had broken 17 cease fire initiatives from the U.N. and we were fed up.
If I kick your butt for smacking my brother,and you say"Stop!I won't do it again"....and then you do it again,and I slap you,and you do it again,and again I slap you .After 17 times ..I'm fed up now I'm really kicking your butt...the only problem is ..I didn't think you had that many brothers who'd fight back.
U.S. out of the U.N.....U.N. out of the U.S.
2006-09-29 17:38:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by AngelsFan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
To give freedom to Iraqi people and to destroy an axis of evil.
US takes no Oil from Iraq.
If it was rekigious, he would have turned against all Islamic countries.
But he did not.
2006-09-29 17:40:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jac Tms 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't see it that way at all. He did it in the name of terrorism and if you ask me more likely in the name of oil money and political power but not God, Christianity or even humanity
2006-09-29 17:34:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by esoreinna 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
In the name of oil, power, lust for land and dominion, sadistic pleasure to crush muslims
2006-09-29 17:34:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
NO He attaked in the name of ant- terrorism
2006-09-29 17:35:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by sl2mickey 2
·
0⤊
0⤋