It would still have been called oranges. The color ORANGE was named for the fruit, not visa versa. Thus oranges would be blue, and we'd have a blue color we call "Orange" The color we know as Orange would have another name entirely - perhaps Blue.
2006-09-29 15:35:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Marvinator 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Orange
2006-09-29 20:29:34
·
answer #2
·
answered by Basil P 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would still be Orange....Orange is the name for the fruit, and not the color of it...if that would be true that we named a fruit after the color....apples would be called red/green/yellow, bananas would be called yellow, plums purple...etc. But we made colors from fruits such as Peach, Plum Purple, blueberry, candy apple red, orange, cranberry, lime green...etc.
2006-09-29 15:49:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by WV_Nomad 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Something-that-nobody-would- eat. Like the question. Or it could be called discoloured-oranges. Is discoloured a word, or am I just a freak with no life? I think that question is quite obvious . . .
2006-09-29 22:46:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by noodle freak with attitude 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blutyfruit
2006-09-29 15:48:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Blueballs
2006-09-29 15:32:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by trolling_for_recs 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
How do you know that what you see as orange is not what I see as blue?
2006-09-29 16:33:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by freggs 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bluoranges.
2006-09-29 15:30:26
·
answer #8
·
answered by Capt'sWife 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
If my aunty had bollocks would she have been my uncle? She didn't, and the orange is orange, so leave it at that.... bloody boring question.
2006-09-29 15:42:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Phish 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
A bad mistake
2006-09-29 15:37:46
·
answer #10
·
answered by Susie 3
·
0⤊
0⤋