Should bathrooms be separated into pee and pooh instead of woman and man?

Question

The stalls in the poop bathroom could be sound proof, and the pee bathroom, which would be larger because it would be used more frequently, wouldn't smell as bad as normal bathrooms do.

Answer 1

First of all genders must be seperated for obvious reasons. Next, the bathrooms for "pee" would look the same as the men's bathroom. And the bathrooms for "poo" would look the same as women's bathrooms. Basically you are asking for a humorous change of name which is really, if reread it, pointless.

Soundproofing the bathrooms would be even worse. To taxpayers and people of the city, they would further disapprove of the change. See? Pointless. Sorry if you didn't like my ideas but logic is logic.

Answer 2

I think it would be a good idea, but for a different reason. It would save water. It would probably be a good idea to segregate the pee bathroom and provide appropriate urinals (in the open for males, as in current men's bathrooms, and in stalls for females) for each sex. Or maybe someone could come up with a unisex urinal, which would have to be in stalls for privacy reasons.

Some eco-toilets, which do not use water based sewerage systems, already require you to pee and poop into separate receptacles.

Answer 3

You know - that is not a half bad idea!!! I still think women would want separate bathrooms, because going to the bathroom is a social thing for women. They adjust their clothes, check their make-up, talk to their girlfriends --- and they wouldn't want to do that in front of men.

But - I agree that would be a good idea - can you imagine what the sign would be on the doors. LOL!

Answer 4

I agree, and the toilet company already put the
female urinal in the market (use in half standing)
but some human problem,
how to avoid some women break the rule and
poop in the urinal.
Also the female urinal can use by both male and female,
if it use it at an open area (just like the man washroom),
space can be save much more.

Answer 5

it truly is my opion with what i already understand, im questioning its because its teo diverse sexs and we are catagorized into one in each of them earlier we sre even born. the element is it will be an issue because human beings will be attempting to sexually asult human beings and sneak peaks and what no longer because all of us are into sex. If we wernt it ought to probably be a lengthy time period diverse tale. also layout element if the lavatory maximum male restrooms have urinals which women human beings can not use, sure i think they could only have lavatories and rather of urinals at our abode. it would nicely be more cost-effective and only extra straightforward to have and look after then a bathroom. adult adult males and women human beings use an identical bathing room at abode so it should be something with problems with creepers, i mean at abode no one would creep on a pal or a minimum of shouldnt. Its sturdy there seperated because it will be an issue with rapes, assults ect. possibly if the international changed into diverse nut the way it really is now its absoloutly nessecery .

Answer 6

Except everyone from both genders would know when you have to pinch a loaf. Imagine if you were a woman in a bar and had to walk into the poo bathroom. All the guys would know you were taking a dump.

Answer 7

Not a bad idea. I've heard of unisexing public bathrooms, but this is new to me. But wouldn't it be cheaper/easier to have one large, sound-proofed, and well-ventilated facility?

Answer 8

Run this by architects as they maybe interested, as thinking outside the box, this is interesting. I can't see humans understanding this, today, but in the future, the logic may be acceptable.

Answer 9

As a man, I wouldnt want to cross that line were you get to see the fullness of female behavior.

Answer 10

No. Someone should just come up with something to rapidly eliminate the smell of doody.