how can i write the following phrase better?"we'll use violence to be heard"?

Answer 1

"Perhaps through violence, we'll finally be heard." or "Must it take violence, for us to be heard?"

Answer 2

Violence will NOT get you "heard". It'll make you a fugitive. Besides, do you really need to harm innocent bystanders just because you're frustrated? The best way to be heard is to become a part of the very system you wish to change, and make changes from within. Outsiders almost never make an impact on anything. They're just laughed off as being part of the "lunatic fringe", but when they hurt, kill, or destroy property to get their message out they are felons, and they;ll never be listened to seriously again. You need to get over yourself- NO ONE'S issues are ever that important in the great scheme of things- my own included.

Answer 3

It would help if the phrase actually made some kind of sense. What sense does it make to threaten violence to be heard. Why not just skip the being heard part if you're going to use violence just take what you want.

Why not say, "We don't want to be heard we want to be obeyed."

Answer 4

Islamic Fundamentalist!

Answer 5

First of all it's a sentence not, not a phrase. Grammatically it's fine as it stands, but you could say it in various ways. Click on my avatar if you really need help.

Answer 6

To be heard we will use violence, in order to be heard we will resort to violence.

Answer 7

If necessary, we will use violence to be heard.
If push comes to shove, we will use violence to be heard.
As a last resort, we will use violence to be heard.

Answer 8

In order to be heard, we will succumb to violence.

Answer 9

Warning I am Not a Pacifist! I'll drink your hearts blood!

Answer 10

It's not bad as it is . . .

We will use violence to be heard.