2006-09-29 13:43:13 · 10 answers · asked by Wren 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Painting
Can you say that again please? You were speaking into my bad ear.
2006-09-29 13:45:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
Van Gogh is often considered a submit-impressionist (he changed into born in 1853 at the same time as impressionism already had a sturdy foothold between artists) so he changed into prompted through lots of the significant impressionists conventional to us consisting of Gauguin, Pissaro and Seurat, the position the superb 2 were to change into mandatory in Van Goghs imaginative progression as they presented him to pointillism which Van Gogh then (who through the time of "Starry nighttime" already in the route of the top of his days) lower than the impression of multiple doubtful drugs (as a results of his psychological ailment) advanced into what on the on the spot is conventional because the very unique and unmistakable signature of Van Gogh. anyhow, to respond to your question specially, Van Gogh turned right into a submit-impressionist and the portray changed into made contained in the pointillist technique ---> submit-impressionist Pointillism
2016-11-25 03:11:18 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Heck no! I use Starry Night as my screen saver on my cell! It's the coolest piece of artwork ever!
2006-09-29 13:58:56 · answer #3 · answered by elease06 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Van Gogh would have never understood the internet. He was always too drunk or to high in absinthe to even understand the world.
He only understood hookers.
2006-09-29 13:46:11 · answer #4 · answered by Pablo 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, He would probable charge you for using if he was living in today's era of consumism
2006-09-29 15:03:44 · answer #5 · answered by pelancha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, if he were in his depressed phase, he probably wouldn't mind so much, but his earlier phase, he'd be thrilled. How interesting would Y!A be if you actually got him to join in?
2006-09-29 13:45:56 · answer #6 · answered by just browsin 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that he'd wonder what Yahoo Answers was more than you using his picture for it.
2006-09-29 13:45:11 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. He was horribly poor when he painted, as well as not at all appreciated, so he'd probably like the exposure.
2006-09-29 13:45:31 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no. go for it, it's 2006.
2006-09-29 13:50:46 · answer #9 · answered by CoolChick2 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he would be flabergasted.......
2006-09-29 16:18:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋