Do you see evolution as a purely scientific endeavor or as a religious one, or both?

Question

And why?

If you believe in god, do you think that god could have used evolution as the means of creation?

If you are against evolution, could you explain why? (and don't say the bible). What about the fossil record? What about the fact that our DNA is less than 3% different than a chimps? What about Selam - the 3.3 million yr old ape-human cutie pie we just found?

No pat answers. I want to know what you think. Not what the bible says. Not what someone else said. No copy and paste. Your own thoughts and beliefs only please.

Swan - what makes you think animals are peaceful? They rape, steal and kill for mates, territory and food. As I see it our animalistic behavior is a perfect example of evolution.

Answer 1

Evolution is simply a set of natural processes, like the weather. It isn't an endeavor at all.

When I was religious (prior to sinking into fundamentalism), I had no problem reconciling religion with evolution. Evolution seemed a rather elegant means of arriving at man. So I certainly don't see that evolution poses any intrinsic problem for religion. It's really only a threat to Biblical literalists who think Genesis is a literally true story rather than a mystical symbolic story.

Answer 2

Evolution is science.

I believe in God because I am a Pascalian Protestant. (Look up "Pascal's Wager" on wikipedia).

God could, and did, use guided evolution. Even the Catholic Church says so. Who am I to gainsay the Pope? There's an overwhelming amount of evidence for evolution following the Cambrian Explosion. [We don't know what caused the Cambrian Explosion, or even if that was a real phenomenon.]

Answer 3

I do not believe in the evolution. I do believe evolution is thinly veiled...as a lie from the father of lies. There is no proof. Those who do believe in it, then must have faith. Faith...believing in something you can't touch or see.

I do believe the Holy Bible. I know you don't want that as an answer but it's the only answer I have.

If you had said 2000+ years ago that man would be flying around in the future going great distances...the people with their lack of technology would have thought you were crazy.

I think (and could be wrong) that perhaps God did things and did not tell people of that time because they couldn't wrap their minds around it.

The Bible does talk about the beasts. Could that mean dinosaurs? I don't know...but perhaps?

As for coming from monkeys or the great apes...Why are there still apes and monkeys? Why didn't all of them "evolve?" Why are we as humans still around? Why haven't we continued to evolve into a higher life form? Evolution leaves to many unanswered questions.

Charles Darwin denounced his own theory. That's all evolution is, a theory. The sad thing is, is that it's being taught as fact.

I'm sticking with my first, only and final answer...God created me in His image (feminine) along with the universe and everything within it...

Answer 4

nicely, you would have by no skill suggested or printed the words "technology is a faith" except to disclaim them, yet you probably did say that you've faith evolution is a faith. As Evolution is technology, you've faith that component of technology is a faith. I heavily doubt that you've study "on the starting place of the Species" through Charles Darwin; no longer to instruct with an open ideas. maximum all the elements that fundamentalist attempt to declare as unproved or no longer conceivable in Evolution were addressed through this e book, yet the regularly happening arguments abound; complicated organs and such. the reality is that Evolution is a technology that has been studied for a great deal of time, with info abounding. the actual shown reality that religous human beings favor to push aside the info, arising with imaginative yet illogical refutations does no longer diminisht the technology. Genetics can instruct progressions of species. I bear in mind at the same time as fundamentalists hailed a clinical searching that confirmed that all human beings are appropriate genetically, suggesting a hassle-free ancestor, yet they by no skill aspect out that an identical technology that confirmed it somewhat is used to reveal how human beings are with regards to different animals. you only can not have section without the entire. both you're taking technology or go away it. in case you want to refute a community of technology, do your self the honour of gaining knowledge of the info of that that you want to refute.

Answer 5

Evolution is pure biology, a natural process. There is nothing supernatural about it, other than the fact that God designed it and set it into motion, just like any other natural process.

Answer 6

Darwinian evolution is a religion the way it is being pursued today. In light of scientific descoveries over the past several decades, the macro evolutionary model does not work. There are many reasons why, but the link below will lead you to most of them. Enjoy.

Answer 7

Well, why can't it be both? Obviously, evolution happened. I also believe in God, so there must be a way to incorporate the two.

Answer 8

Purely scientific, the problem is we cannot progress because of the constant religious arguments being placed in the way.

Answer 9

I believe that it's a purely scientific endeavor and fundies have no right to try to "punch holes" in it, especially if they don't have a masters in science.

Answer 10

Don't believe in either theory.Evolutionist or creationist.We are too violent of a species to have evolved from peaceful animals.Think about it.As far as creationist theories,whether you believe in God or not.Would a benevolent creator have created something like us.For what purpose?There has to be another answer,but what I don't know.