Is it okay to use the US Military to attack religious people on American soil?

Question

Irregardless of the fact that the Wacko of Waco had a problem with his FFL, Clinton and Reno sent in tanks to attack American citizens. Your thoughts on justification for this?

1. The Wacko of Waco commited no violent act and was a suspected threat at most. He had no WMDs!

2. The BATF doesn't have tanks!!!

3. We uses tanks to kill child molesters??

Answer 1

Its coming.

Answer 2

it would not quit them, even with the indisputable fact that it might want to likely provide them a lot less reason to truly do those attacks, and may want to maximum likely sluggish the speed of attacks, that may continually be extra perfect. human beings do not realize that terrorists do not act in simple terms because they have a particular hatred for a particular crew because they couldn't in any respect get adequate of a following for it. after we do some thing to ask it, that's yet another tale. Oh, and in accordance to all those those who say we weren't occupying some thing earlier 9/11, that's a farcical actuality. We were occupying many middle jap international locations on the on the spot. besides, 9/11 wasn't brought about in simple terms through that, yet as well through the movements of u.s. in the course of the chilly conflict, in that we presented guns to the Afghani's to wrestle the Soviets (good idea) and then left them thoroughly to themselves for rebuilding afterwards (undesirable idea).

Answer 3

If a group poses a threat to the public, then an appropriate response needs to be made. I don't see what religion has to do with it - your question implies that religious groups should be cut some kind of slack - if somebody's going to try to trigger World War III, it doesn't matter if they pray to Zeus or the Flying Spaghetti Monster - deal with it.

This is of course, separate to if the response to Waco was the appropriate one - I'll leave that as an exercise to the reader.

Answer 4

irregardless isn't a real word.

The military wasn't used in the Waco thing, it was the ATF.

It all depends on what type of threat this group is making to the United States.

Answer 5

No off course not, he should just sent a few marshals in to have a shoot out like the Broccoli President did at Ruby Ridge in 1991.

Answer 6

Somehow I think you are confusing your facts. The "religious" organization was armed to the hilt with fire arms, assault weapons, and other implements of destruction..that is why the FBI became interested in them .... They were dealing with a supremacy group that for all intents and purposes, had nothing to do with religion, but appeared to be preparing a private army. Where do you get your facts from?

Answer 7

These religious cults are dangerous and abusive, they steal our young by brain washing, they take on many vary young wives for self satisfaction, we could go on and on but to answer your question, you bet your life they have justification they need to take out a whole lot more of these Waco cults that are claiming religious status, in my view they are nothing more than a menus to society.

Answer 8

the Us military may well need to attack American citizens. when they arm themselves and build an arsenal of weapons they become a danget to society.

I would rather live in a country where the military sometimes has to attack citizens. than in a country where citzens are allowed to form a legal private army and possibly use it to force their beliefs on everyone else.

Answer 9

Everyone is entitled to their opinions for one. If everyone only followed the ten commandments this world would not be as bad as it is.

Answer 10

Yes, they were protecting society in general