Religion legally ALWAYS refers to a faith in a deity (or deities). Your question therefore makes no sense. Religion as metaphor does not apply in this legal question.
2006-09-29 07:19:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Pure semantics. Knowledge is the best antidote against religion. So, mandatory schooling in non-religious schools cannot possibly violate de separation of state from church.
2006-09-29 14:13:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no church of knowledge. All have a piece of the knowledge. Separation is an illusions...but not under this particular concept.
2006-09-29 14:13:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by jmmevolve 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possibly, but if that is true, establishing a federal reserve and printing currency would definitely be an unconstitutional establishment of "religion" (using that definition).
Far more people worship money above all else including education or imaginary friends.
2006-09-29 14:22:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by Left the building 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
no it does not.... i cannot see how it does... the only people i can see having a problem with it is the Amish.. they go to school until eighth grade they believe that education causes pride and that is a sin... so maybe for them it would but otherwise no...
2006-09-29 14:21:11
·
answer #5
·
answered by coopchic 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think so. if its against your religion to contribute to your contry then you need to gtfo. i pay for enough deadbeats. my hard earned cash is being taken by government and given to people who are to lazy to work. (and if u dont go to school who is goign to hire u?)
2006-09-29 14:13:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you would receive more answers in the education section
2006-09-29 15:32:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by heresyhunter@sbcglobal.net 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no
2006-09-29 14:13:11
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋