2006-09-29 05:56:49 · 24 answers · asked by james44_20 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
reading some of the responses I should have been clear. I am just curious what people's opinion on this is. I'm not involved with someone younger than 21 not would I. Just curious.
2006-09-29 06:00:47 · update #1
For starters you shouldn't date anyone under the age of 18 well I guess that really depends on age regulations where you are located. But in my opinion I like to go out and drink and have a good time at a night club or bar and here you can't do that with anyone under the age of 21. So it's basically your call. I think anyone under 18 is way to young.
2006-09-29 06:01:13 · answer #1 · answered by kelly_frogs 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
18
2006-09-29 05:58:41 · answer #2 · answered by navymilitarybrat76 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
18
2006-09-29 05:58:35 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
18
2006-09-29 05:58:29 · answer #4 · answered by stocketrader24 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
20
2006-09-29 05:59:04 · answer #5 · answered by lost_in_love_still 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
20
2006-09-29 05:58:41 · answer #6 · answered by kardea 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
20
2006-09-29 05:58:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think that the youngest should be 18. But that's only if the girl is mature enough to deal with all the BS that a 23 year old can throw at her.
2006-09-29 05:59:33 · answer #8 · answered by wilsonhutchison04 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
19
2006-09-29 05:59:00 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'm 18 and relationship a 20 3 hundred and sixty 5 days-old. i think of it makes extra sense for the guy to be somewhat older because of the fact females mature swifter. It makes the adulthood point extra balanced! i think of a distance of as much as 4 years in age is the shrink, nevertheless. It gets somewhat iffy till the couple are older and extra settled of their existence.
2016-10-18 04:59:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋