http://www.fightcps.com/2002_03_03_archive.html
After ranting about child abuse in church-affiliated state custody facilities, FindLaw commentator Marci Hamilton states:
...churches' bids for complete autonomy, and even for liability waivers, should be denied, and they should be held liable for civil damages, and face criminal penalties, when they were aware of child abuse and did not address it. The Massachusetts' House vote this week to require clergy to report child abuse, which was already required of therapists, teachers, and social workers, is a step in the right direction.
The fact that the churches are accepting public money only adds additional government leverage. For instance, public funds should be automatically cut off as soon as credible complaints are brought. And accessible, fast-moving administrative procedures run by the government, not the church, should be made available whenever it is alleged that children are being harmed.
2006-09-29
03:55:19
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality