2006-09-28 23:40:21 · 18 answers · asked by Oracle 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Maybe, because it seems that Pakistan is more than happy to bomb India & its people?
2006-09-30 05:11:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think people need to look more closely at your question before they put you down.
Pakistan is well known for looking after Terrorists and is a safe haven for them,I even think that's where O.B.L is being looked after along with a few others.
There are certain regions in Pakistan that need Dealing with but of course they have Nuclear Weapons now so everyone treads softly.
I need to stress that Not all the people in Pakistan support Terrorists so to Bomb the whole country would be wrong.
2006-09-29 00:21:12 · answer #2 · answered by mentor 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
i don't think of anybody in the U. S. government reported that. Extremists on the two facets comb the information centers and papers for outrageous, incendiary statements, and it is probable that it quite is only yet another occasion. I advise you examine Charles Krauthammer's column on the instant approximately what Muslims have reported. His view is rather unbalanced, of direction, however the selective costs from Muslim rabble rousers are probable precise.
2016-10-18 04:34:53 · answer #3 · answered by connely 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is it with these Neocons that they think a gun or a bomb is some sort of magic wand to change people's minds?
"Bomb them back to the stoneage" was the whacko thinking of General William Westmoreland in Viet Nam in the 1960s and survived in the lexicon until the 21st Century only because it was an example of classic military misunderstand of the enemy.
Shoot, chile, we DID bomb the NVA and Viet Cong for 10 years. Remember "Operation Rolling Thunder"? Ask Senator McCain how well that turned out. Or just visit the US protectorate in Hanoi. Oh wait, there isn't one. We lost.
Fortunatly, unlike our simian asker, I believe the USAF and other military planners actually have learned that carpet bombing and nukes are not a diplomatic, or effective, way to make friends in the world.
Now if someone would just clue Dubya the Monkey in on the facts.
2006-09-28 23:46:41 · answer #4 · answered by Grendle 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes! Due to the madrassas...
Note the following from Bloomberg news: Afghan President Hamid Karzai today said a small portion of Pakistan's religious schools, called madrassas, are ``training grounds for terrorists'' and a serious threat to the world.
``There will not be an end to terrorism unless we remove the sources of hatred in madrassas,'' Karzai said in a speech at the Woodrow Wilson Center, a policy study group in Washington.
Karzai's comments come two days before he's scheduled to discuss cooperation in the war on terrorism with U.S. President George W. Bush and Pakistan President Pervez Musharraf at the White House.
Karzai has accused Pakistan of not doing enough to stop Taliban fighters from using the mountainous border region between the two countries as a haven. The fighters stepped up attacks in Afghanistan in recent weeks as Afghan and international forces expand their operations to the south and east.
2006-09-28 23:44:50 · answer #5 · answered by juandos 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
This question leads to another question.. How are BUSHCO going to win a war on terrorism when his two 'great' allies both deny they have terrorists in their countries and hate each other. Is there anything that BUSCO does that is uncomplicated?
2006-09-29 00:18:44 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm horrified by your question - if Pakistan were bombed, where would the banks put all their call centres??
2006-09-29 00:07:35 · answer #7 · answered by boredatwork 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No, just the ones who think killing in the name of God is a sane idea.
At least they all go to hell and wont mess up heaven for the rest of us.
2006-09-28 23:49:36 · answer #8 · answered by J23 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Thats funny....it would take, what, one small bomb to do it? They are one step above Troglodites already.
2006-09-29 00:24:52 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
why not the casualty list would be low as they all live in Birmingham and Bradford and Leicester etc....
2006-09-28 23:45:13 · answer #10 · answered by Monkeyphil 4 · 6⤊ 2⤋