I think he doesn't even care for the country. He will be better playing cricket, then CONTROLLING the country. What a jerk... What do you think about the " Cricket player who shouldn't be controlling england... "
2006-09-28 21:20:23 · 26 answers · asked by ^^ＮａＴａＬｉＥ^^ 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
"yo Blair" said Dubya to phoney Blair, that says it all for me!
Get our troops outta iraq and afghanistan, they are only there because of oil hungry despots hiding behind the joke that democracy has become.
The "terrorist" thing is a result of unwarrented incursions to plunder another countrys natural resources.
We have the most expensive cost of living in Europe now and more and more people are emigrating away from our country of birth.
I'll be right behind them believe me!
2006-09-28 21:34:29 · answer #1 · answered by HarryBore 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The sooner he emigrates to America the better for all of us, he is such a turn coat that man, he made all these promises and never fulfilled them, typical government Prime Minister, he spends more time abroad than he does here, every time there's a crisis he is never around, look at the scare in the summer over terrorists blowing up our planes, were was he, sunning himself in the Caribbean and not giving a flying fig about us lot, we were left with a moron running the country who's main interest is casinos and sleeping with other women, he reckons he is putting millions into health care and education, well how come people are having to go abroad for operations and the kids leaving school can't read and write properly, his wife and Bush are running our country while he has a jet set life at our expense, the sooner he goes the better is all I can say.
2006-09-29 14:52:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has done some good things for this country, and has probably done a better job than any of the other party leaders could have done, he is a good leader. I will admit there are a lot of things he did which I disagree with, but no politician can satisfy everybodys' needs and desires. Another thing is that the Prime Minister does not 'control' the country, it is ruled by the PM, meaning that the PM makes decisions that they think is best for the country, and its tough luck if not eveybody likes it - he shows hes a good leader by not turning back on his decisions to satisfy other people - only weak leaders would do such a thing!
2006-09-28 21:34:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Blair has done a fantastic job with running this country it just so happened that during his time in power he was faced with the biggest ever threat and indeed attacks from terrorists and he had to make decisions about whether to go to war and the like which i really would not like to have made. also by introducing tuition fees and top up fees is a good idea in my opinion because it means students will hopefully work harder knowing that they are paying for the education they are receiving and should cut the drop out rate and yes i am a university student currently and having to pay fees. the state of the HS is much better than it has ever been and even though there are a few NHS trusts lagging behind the general state of the nhs is far better than any other leader could have made it.
tony Blair rocks!!!!
2006-09-28 21:29:00 · answer #4 · answered by missree 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Seems to me that Blair was about the only person in England that remembers that it was the United States that kept you from goose stepping to the post office. He holds the gratitude of the country and offered the help of a fledgling nation to honor the US in it's time of need. And yes, the war in Iraq is ridicules and Bush is a moron. No matter, Tony Blair is a hero!
2006-09-28 21:28:31 · answer #5 · answered by m-t-nest 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Tony Blair ,Tricked and Deceived the Labour Party into Electing Him as their leader ,together with Brown , Prescott and numerous other useless Deadbeat , so called "Politicians" has done massive damage to Great Britain , which will take many years to rectify , no matter who , or which Party is elected at the next Farce called an "Election" = God Help Great Brittain .
2006-09-28 21:46:56 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i think he is a waste of good tax payers money, but on the other hand dont you see a lot of the other polititions changing oh so slightly to blairs way of doing things, the british people no longer believe what these polititions are saying, because of the lies and spin that we have all been fed on over the last ten years.
2006-10-02 08:31:56 · answer #7 · answered by michael p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evil, pure evil. Both he and Thatcher have thrown the British public to corporate sharks of America. Unforgivable and lrreperable damage has been done. Not to mention the War in Iraq, the UN sanctions and all the rest of it. I hope he lives long and suffers greatly. Bastard.
2006-09-29 00:30:54 · answer #8 · answered by dingdong 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have been very pleasantly surprised by the leadership and courage shown by Prime Minister Blair. I don't agree with your assessment.
When his party took power I rather expected Blair to be something of an empty suit. I have found him to be a much better national leader than I expected he would be.
2006-09-28 21:33:31 · answer #9 · answered by Warren D 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I think he is an arrogant git. But however bad he is you can't forget about the good things that labour have done for this country over the last ten years. Anyone remember how bad things were under a tory government? He may have sold his soul to the devil but he did introduce things like tax credits, affordable childcare, etc...
2006-09-28 21:34:58 · answer #10 · answered by meep meep!! 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋