any good reason why not? Think of all of the lasting psychological damage that they have done to children by that time, 3 convictions!! Why the hell isn't it this a law already? Who would oppose it?
2006-09-28 20:51:07 · 15 answers · asked by keepitsafe2think 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
thats giving them too many chances, they should only get 2
we already know that they cannot be rehabilitated, chemical castration doesnt work, the authorities cannot keep tabs on them like they are supposed to
and they ought to disband that national club for men who love children and make it illegal
2006-09-28 21:41:10 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i say violent sex offenders could both be done or existence in reformatory. yet no matter if that's a sex offense with someone over 15 and the offending party is lower than 25 i do not accept as true with the existence or execution. yet when the offense finally ends up in the death of the newborn, throw the change. plus the international will be extra perfect off without them and as a part note all the wackos in mabla (guy and boy love ***.) should be despatched to detention middle forever
2016-12-06 08:55:00 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it should be done on the first conviction. Because 93% of pedophiles who are released from prison will commit another sex crime with a child. If you eliminate the offender the first time, there will be no second offense, no second hurt child and the world will have one less thing to worry about.
2006-09-28 21:07:23 · answer #3 · answered by Huevos Rancheros 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm not going to disagree with one thing. Child sex predators are indeed a waste of space, and probably the worst scum of the world.
But maybe 'death by execution' isn't the answer we are looking for. Think for a moment any predator who may have wrongly accused, yes three times wrongly accused. If we put them in Jail for a life sentence then there is always time to check out their guilt, and so if they are proven innocent (even if it is when they are grey and old) at least Justice would be served fairly.
I will never condone the acts of a sexual predator of any kind, but I will never agree that 'death by execution' is the solution either.
2006-09-28 20:57:31 · answer #4 · answered by Aaron G 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
How about life in prison after the first conviction? Death is too easy for these monsters. Plus, it costs taxpayers approx. 2-4 million dollars more than putting them away for life. One more reason is that the punishment doesn't really fit the crime.
2006-09-28 20:55:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The first conviction would be better, but you are on the right track.
2006-09-28 21:12:21 · answer #6 · answered by .45 Peacemaker 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I want to form a vigilante. We should pretend to be little kids on line and when the sick bastards come slithering over let's beat their balls in with a hammer...
2006-09-28 20:57:32 · answer #7 · answered by B B 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you. If I molested a child I would want put down like a sick dog.
2006-09-28 20:54:00 · answer #8 · answered by not coming back 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
My opinion is death first time.. Why give them more chances to do it!
2006-09-28 20:53:27 · answer #9 · answered by Mommadog 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I for one would not oppose it! I think that with their first offense they should be castrated!!
2006-09-28 20:54:05 · answer #10 · answered by bettywitdabigbooty 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋