Just think Prescott used to be the leader of the shipworkers union !!
The fat, lazy, useless bastard`s ship well and truly came in when he turned traitor and joined the slave labour government. I hope the pointless c*nt has bad,bad nightmares .
2006-09-28 20:27:30
·
answer #1
·
answered by dingdong 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Norman Lamont is a stable candidate for that call. He controlled to place and shop Britain in recession whilst lots of the international became doing particularly nicely. John important has to take some credit for persuading the electorate that the recession became a international phenomenon and not unique to the united kingdom (because it became). different applicants are Antony Eden and Tony Blair (over Iraq). David Owen became probable the main ineffectual baby-kisser ever: in the tip he had to sort his own social gathering because of the fact no-one else might "gang" (particular, that's what they reported as themselves) up with him. And Geoffrey Archer became purely a criminal. Prescott has easily achieved purely somewhat. somebody pronounced smoke alarms, there is likewise the decent residences standards, which regrettably would not practice to non-public landlords. the dept of the deputy top minister would not only sit down idle. those are only politicians in my lifetime, yet you, being attracted to history, would desire to for sure observe of lots extra.
2016-10-18 04:28:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by jaisigh 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Every day that he continues in Her Majesty's Government is a disgrace to the country. He's abused his office and authority, and bungled everything he's attempted (useless regional assemblies, the 'pathfinder' scheme destroying good homes, failing to sort out the railways). It's no news that he's announcing he'll go in a year- everyone knew that. He and other members of this government simply have no shame.
2006-09-28 20:51:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dunrobin 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he's just a bit of an idiot. No worse than many other politicians from either side of the politcal fence.
I did think a little more of him when he punched that bloke who threw the eggg though. The man had a mullet as well so he deserved a punch in the face for that alone.
On the whole though...Too fat to run, too stupid to hide...
2006-09-28 20:36:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by PETER F 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do I detect I slight hint of bias in your, ahem, question? :) Smacks more of a statement, really. But, yes, I cant think of one thing the man has done politically that has been of benefit to the country. However, he, in his numerous aberrations, did distract the electorate from far more damaging political news and blunders by the Labour party. He was/is the perfect fall guy for Tony Blair.
2006-09-28 20:35:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by AaronO 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Big fat useless waste of space whose indiscretions have highlighted the fact that most MP's are only there for one thing..... to get out of it what they can. Should all be made to live on a London council estate and paid the minimum wage with the exception of Tony Blair who should be made to live off benefits
2006-09-28 20:11:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by woowah 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
He is all the things already said,useless,etc but hey don't worry Bliar will look after him. He will be Lord Prescott of Arizona and will be on a dozen quangos at £100,000 a year each plus perks!
2006-09-28 20:15:08
·
answer #7
·
answered by Rob Roy 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Good for Blair but bad for everyone else.
An unprincipled, hypocritical fool who should be made to pay back his salary.
2006-09-28 23:27:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Al 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I Agree with your every word , Apololgy ? he was really sneering at everyone ,he is rotten to the core , that goes for the rest of the foul hypocrites in this so called Government .
2006-09-28 20:02:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Just another shiney-arsed opportunist.
He is only resigning a deputy PM the fat git will still, apparently, be around!
2006-09-28 20:05:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋