We should stand together, because it is unpatriotic and traitorous to not support our OWN troops at war. But with all the whining, crying, and mud-slinging its hard to hear anything else.
Joe D, infighting and bickering internally, strengthens our enemies externally. Where do you get that there was NO terrorists in Iraq until we invaded? What are you smoking? What is Saddam? YOU are the know-it-all that is confused.Sorry........
2006-09-28 16:21:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Diana 3
·
2⤊
7⤋
The liberals have too much hate for the President. They feel we can all just sit down together, us and the terrorists, by a campfire and roast marshmallows and think nice thoughts, and we'll all be friends in the morning. They are consumed with making the President look bad. I can't figure out any other reason but that when the libs in the media undermine the war effort by printing classified secrets. I'm all for a united front. Being a Conservative also means I'm a realist, and that means I ain't holding my breath.
2006-09-28 16:26:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mr. Boof 6
·
3⤊
3⤋
Although I love your positive attitude about this and your "team effort", I feel that it is easier said than done. We are talking about WAR here. I'm afraid you have no concept of what that means. This is not cops and robbers.
* You say Terrosit are our ENEMY (true). Then why Iraq? And why is Terroism worse than before? It's just not that simple. Sorry
2006-09-28 16:34:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Yes it is to much to ask, when a government gets so oppressive the people have a right and duty to revolt. This administration has completely trashed the constitution in the name of terror, the only thing that I do agree with is to bring the troops home. They have done their job and it is up to the Iraqi people to decide what kind of government that they want to rule them. They will never support a puppet government set up by George Bush.
2006-09-28 16:22:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
Conditionally. What is your definition of terrorist? The detainees in Gitmo, 70-90% of which are likely innocent civilians? Iraq, which had no terrorist problem until we invaded and occupied their country? How about Pakistan, who is likely playing games with us regarding Bin Laden and the remainder of the Taliban? Are protesting liberals considered terrorists?
And Diana, stop confusing supporting a corrupt adminsitration with supporting the trops. It is not the same. I know of no one who does not support our troops, regardless of party.
2006-09-28 16:21:53
·
answer #5
·
answered by Joe D 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
you realize, i don't disagree with you. it would be great if each and every physique had unfastened get right of entry to to the superb wellness care interior the international. And what a magnificent international it would be if absolutely everyone worked for a union that payed extensive wages and certain us we could retire in wealth at age 40. i think of all of us would desire to offer up our polluting autos and journey Unicorns powered by potential of rainbows. each and every American would desire to get carry of a complicated degree from the main prestigious universities while not having to attend classes. those are basically a number of the flaws the Communist & Socialist promise us. even nonetheless, interior the historic previous of the international none of those political platforms has ever worked. each and each time a Communist or Socialist party has attained capacity it resulted interior the completed loss of all own freedoms of its electorate, financial injury of the country, the loss of life of tens of millions of "enemies of the state" (absolutely everyone who disagrees with those in capacity) the destruction of enterprise and production, famine, ailment and ultimately entire failure. you do not would desire to take my be conscious for it, in simple terms study slightly historic previous. Mao, Stalin & Castro all oppressed and murdered their human beings and destroyed their countries. In China & Russia the give way of communism and the upward push of capitalism stored their countries from injury. Cuba continues to be a communist united states of america and is floundering in debt and has an exceptionally low typical of residing. Castro hasn't murdered tens of millions yet he has a lots smaller inhabitants base to be certain on between. easily you're conscious of the vast disaster that became into the socialist regime of Hitler & the Nazis.And in simple terms seem at modern-day-day Europe. Socialist countries all and all are going bankrupt. And who do they turn to for the money to pay their charges? u.s. the evil capitalist united states of america. Your manifesto sounds great. the only difficulty with it rather is that it by no potential has and by no potential will paintings.
2016-10-15 08:08:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd like that to happen.
Actually,just so you know,I dont really care about the politics of strangers,but its my experience I do get attacked a lot out of nowhere,in my own country.Just saying.
2006-09-29 09:29:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Actually, I was in favor of this a few months ago and I even suggested it, as you have now. The trouble is---if you read all the answers you received and you can determine the political philosophy of most, you will see that the liberals make it impossible. They will be pulling against the USA until doomsday. I'm not sure some of them are not terrorists fanning the flames of hatred.
2006-09-28 16:50:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
What are you doing here? You should be in Iraq joining the effort to "kick butt". YOu insult people here everyday and you want us Liberals to buy into your lies? And holier than thou attitude? Well NO is my answer
2006-09-29 04:54:03
·
answer #9
·
answered by JS 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
We aren't disagreeing that the terrorists need to be stopped, it's the Iraq conflict that we do not agree about.
2006-09-28 16:18:18
·
answer #10
·
answered by notme 5
·
7⤊
1⤋