Background:
When I was in college, I dealt with people who listened carefully to both sides of an argument. The substance of the presentation was more important than the style of presentation. That was where I learned how to persuade people
This Site:
On this site, I'ved learned to adopt tactics tuned to an entirely different audience:
- Most people won't read more than a few lines of your argument.
- If you try to assert something contrary to surface appearances, you are unlikely to succeed
- A short snappy put-down is more convincing than a carefully reasoned argument
- Group affiliation (or ethnicity) trumps reason. Most people support their own kind, right or wrong.
After participating on this site, I've come to understand exactly why politicians "dumb-down" their arguments. Careful reasoning doesn't seem to have much to do with how decisions are made here.
What have you learned form your questions and answers on this site?
2006-09-28
14:58:18
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Tom D
4
in
Social Science
➔ Other - Social Science
To "The One"
I don't expect people to be any different here than other places, nor did I say I would.
I have learned almost nothing from answers received on this site, per se, but I have learned a great deal about persuasive techniques. This site is particularly useful for getting feedback on various means of persuasion.
2006-09-28
17:00:33 ·
update #1
Two other things I've learned about persuasive techniques:
- People will use the slightest excuse to assign an "agenda" to your statements, no matter how hard you try to be neutral. Everyone wants to view statements in terms of conflict.
- People would rather believe a pleasant fantasy than face-up to hard facts, particularly when those hard facts diminish them in some way.
2006-09-29
06:10:54 ·
update #2