Do you believe George Bush when he says that by fighting the enemy in Iraq, we don't have to fight them here?

Question

I just don't see the logic in that statement, yet that is the reason he gives for us continuing to fight in Iraq. What do you think?

Answer 1

There is no logic in his statements, they change on a daily basis, except the Iraq war. No I don't believe a word he utters (butchers).
We will only be fighting in Iraq until someone (country, countries) decides Bush has gone too far and invade, occupy the USA.
This November we ought to vote to recall Bush, his appointed staff, and anyone in Congress who has stood behind his inept decisions.

Answer 2

Face it, it is asserted as the blame activity. Liberals blame on Republicans then Republicans blame on the Democrats. issues like this why is u.s. is falling down. Bush particular wasn't the final yet he particular became't the worst the two. He get up against Terrorism after 9/11 and invaded Afghanistan with finished Approval from Congress. in spite of the undeniable fact that issues turn down hill whilst Bush became heavily criticized for invading Iraq in keeping with a faux Intel(everybody Intel in the western international believed it) that Saddam Hussein had WMDs yet that would not exchange the excuse that he violated 19 of the 22 resolutions that became placed after him via the United u . s . a . protection Council in the ceasefire 1991 Gulf conflict which permit protection rigidity action against Iraq every time they needed. besides because of the fact the Patriot Act and Guantanamo Bay torture abuse. yet that would not advise that Bush is the worst. Bush isn't on my own in this reason, he had many staffs that needed this way of stuff. Obama isn't doing that super the two. He had tripled extra national debt than in the process the 8 3 hundred and sixty 5 days term of Bush.

Answer 3

No, I think that you're right, it would be just as hard for you and me to go and terrorize say Afghanistan as it would be for them to come over here and terrorize us. Terrorists are generally a home-grown affair and each case is a separate crime. To say that there have been no crimes like this committed for so many years is ridiculous, it's not as though they were happening every other Tuesday before the war in Afghanistan and Iraq. Furthermore, Britain, France and Germany have large Muslim populations and if terrorist 'fever' were that large a deal with ordinary Muslims there SHOULD be bombings over there every week.

Answer 4

It's not about a "war on terror" or "fighting for freedom". Here's the REAL reason for Bush's obsession with Iraq!...
http://www.strayreality.com/Lanis_Strayreality/iraq.htm

Answer 5

I can't say with absolute certainty that Bush is right or wrong. I do believe that if the "Terrorists" wanted to bring the war here, they could find a way. What disturbs me about Bush's attitude is that it's not OK to have Americans die, but it is OK to allow hundreds of thousands of Innocent Iraqis die just to keep the war away from this country. And yes, I am aware that a lot of Iraqi deaths are due to the suicide bombers operating there but we are also complicit in their deaths.

Answer 6

No I do not believe him in that statement what so many of the willing sheep forgot is there are splinter cells of terrorist still here in America that have not been found and could strike anytime, we have so much of this to blame on ourselves anyhow for the truth be told we trained many of the ones that we are now fighting, in order to have chaos in the regimens not friendly to our way of thinking

Answer 7

It is one of the few things on which I agree with him. By toppling Saddamy, we created a battlefront in Iraq. We keep the terrorists in the MidEast where they seem to be killing each other more than US soldiers. (Not that it is a good thing that they are attacking each other, but it's better than watching another skyscraper fall.)

The terrorists' goal is to kill infidels. If we stay in Iraq, they attack our soldiers. If we leave, who's stopping them from attacking us here?

Answer 8

I believe 9/11 was just the excuse he needed to get us in there and keep us there. We will have standing armies in Iraq... and Iran when we finally invade there, too. Ask the Romans what standing armies cost them.

Answer 9

If you wing nutz hated the enemy as much as Bush, this war would be over by now!

Answer 10

Yes, there is logic in it. If you can keep your enemy disorganized and pinned down in one area, he will not be able to organize and mobilize. Tactics 101