Should the US police the world ?

Answer 1

The US cant even police their own Country. You have the most amount of kills/murders in the world. Averaging about 12,000 to 13,000 a year.
Canada is around 60.
The UK is about 12.
Australia 4
And it only gets better.

If the US was to police the entire world, I think it would send the world into a large killing finatic

Answer 2

Then who is going to police the police of the world?

Answer 3

No, the US should not police the world, but the world demands America gets involved, even when the country doesn't want to.

Answer 4

We are hardly in a position to police the world, when it's obvious we cannot police our own country, secure our borders from drugs and illegal aliens, end the corruption in the White House.

Answer 5

No. Hell no. so a ways, we've spent trillions doing so. a similar those that whinge approximately taxes are a similar ones helping this international empire that comes immediately out of their paychecks. and then of direction, there is the selectivity of our policing. We forget approximately approximately genocides in countless countries, and yet attack defenseless countries because of their organic ingredients. We even have an prolonged history of helping blood-thirsty dictators, overthrowing democratically elected governments, helping terrorist companies, scuffling with idealistic wars or getting proxies to do it for us, and the checklist is going on. we're not policing. we are empire development. we've been paying lip service to democracy, mutually as steam rolling others in the call of our national hobbies. So-reported as conservatives help those extremely-liberal distant places rules mutually as concurrently soliciting for tax cuts which create enormous defecits that are literally spending us out of economic. we've been a self-serving ego-maniacal u . s . a . for the previous 60 years, and it is commencing as much as get closer us. If we don't start up changing our techniques, our u . s . a . would be bankrupt in a pair of an prolonged time. That comes immediately from the government duty place of work. human beings would desire to awaken, study history, and end taking the blue pill. we gained't even look after our own u . s . a .. What the hell makes human beings think of they'd look after the international from now on appropriate? particularly whilst your government helps protection rigidity dictatorships and regimes with questionable human rights archives with a view to shield "favorable" kinfolk. The democrats are liberal, the RINOs are liberal. the only candidate it is even conversing approximately it quite is Ron Paul. he's not pulling those products out of skinny air. The CIA comments have been saying this for years. Former intelligenece officers have written books approximately this for years. The GAO has been saying this for years. yet no person listens. i desire that folk comprehend the place we are headed earlier it is too previous because of do something approximately it. ~X~

Answer 6

the US does nto police the world, the problem is that every other country gives the facts, we do the works. when we hear about global warming, deforestation, terrorism, we dont just get in the news and talk about it, we go into the feild and put a stop to it. if theres a problem with caring then maybe the US is at fault, but if you want to accuse it for that then you might want to pray to allah and ram a car into my house

Answer 7

No, I dont think that the US should police the world becouse it is posible that a nother world war would arise, becoming world war 3,4,5,6, or 7depending on the time.

Answer 8

No. What right does the US or any other country have to police anywhere else. It's the same as saying should Spain police the US or should Nigeria police the US.

Answer 9

No, I don't believe they should because if an area of the world can't support its self, it has neighbouring areas, and others. Besides the efforts in Iraq, have just caused more terrorists to rally there, causing more of a threat. So if that's going to happen, DON'T DO IT ANYWHERE ELSE!!!

Answer 10

They most certainly should not!

I don't believe the world is anywhere near ready to have one country's laws and principals governing every other country's, it's a silly idea - just look at all the problems and wars caused simply because one people's religious beliefs differ to another people's.