I find it rather cute that WWE claims that they don't favor RAW over SMACKDOWN!. I also find it strange that when the WHC was on RAW, it was said to be "the richest prize in the game". Now all of the sudden the WWE title is the biggest prize, and is on RAW. I just don't get it.......hmm. Could it be favoritism? No, that's just not possible!
2006-09-28 15:02:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by HizardcoreMike 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the World Heavyweight Title is the World title while the WWE title is only WWE, so technically, World Heavyweight is better, but in ECW's case, Big Show's title is ECW World Hevyweight I think. So I don't know to be honest. But guys like Edge don't deserve to be WWE Champions, they they should go for the Intercontinental, United States, Crusierweight, or get a partner and go for World Tag Team Championship, not WWE Championship, cuz then technically, when Edge was champ, he was technically better than Undertaker, Mark Henry, The Great Khali, Batista, and even Triple H, cuz he was a champion, while those mentioned weren't. While usually the better wrestlers are the World Heavyweight Champions, guys like Undertaker, Batista, Kurt Angle, etc. While WWE Champs are guys like Edge, John Cena, and JBL.
So saying all that, I would have to pick the World Heavyweight Championship as the better one.
2006-09-28 15:01:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Fantasy King 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
World Heavyweight Is Way Better But It Would Be Better On Raw
But Cena Would Get It And Stuff It Up Into A Spinner
2006-09-28 16:47:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Pizza Boy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
World Heavyweight Title has its roots in the NWA back before the WCW was even started. And also how prestigous can the WWE title be if its called the WWE title when it used to be called the WWF title and furthermore it looks like a spinner rim for a car which i must admit is quite tacky.
2006-09-28 13:49:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by zz56zz56 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
WWE Title because i would rather be known as a WWE champion than a World Heavyweight Chapmion.
Its got nothing to do with how the tittle looks but i would put more bling on it and take out the spinner.
2006-09-28 14:32:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Latti 4X400 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
when i see the world title belt, it makes me think of all the former wrestling greats who have held that title. however, the wwe title in it's spinning glorly just doesn't have the same prestigous appearance. i don't even have a problem with cena being the champion... just changing the look of the belt has made it less meaningful.
2006-09-29 06:41:37
·
answer #6
·
answered by ksneo627 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Undisputed Championship!
2006-09-28 13:55:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by AbsoluteMart! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
World Heavyweight title. It was first and it doesn't have a freakin' spinner on it. Cena really messed up that title!
2006-09-28 14:25:23
·
answer #8
·
answered by Susan L 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
heavyweight is way more prestigous bcos if u compare the champ for both of the title, heavyweight have more better champ...
2006-09-28 20:06:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The wwe is mor prestigous becasue it was the orignial title and it can never be replaced
2006-09-28 14:36:21
·
answer #10
·
answered by Matt: aka; Edge is world champ!! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋