how would the USA be today if ?

Question

do you think the usa would be a more peaceful safer place today if al gore had been elected president instead of george bush.Since their election ended bush has gone on to war gore has gone on to promote saving the world like in his movie.Two very different scenarios so how would the usa be if gore was the president

Answer 1

It's hard to say because when Gore and Clinton were in charge they gave so much away. It's also hard to imagine anyone doing a worse job than Bush is doing.

Answer 2

Gore would have invaded and bombed the heck out of Afghanistan in order to get Bin Laden after 9/11 but he would have not invaded Iraq. Pretty sure.

Since Iraq is a breeding ground of terrorism in these days...yeah -we could have saved us that pain.

But other than that...those regions always were unstable and sooner or later one of those countries goes off anyways. It could then instead have been Pakistan. Without all the US funds they receive now perhaps Musharraf would have already been overthrown and Pakistan and India would be on the crest of a nuclear war.

Ultimately - what ever path we take on the microscopic scale of time (weeks...years) - on the macroscopic scale it does not make a lot of a difference. Since the determining variables of our fate don't change: access to energy; larger impacts on earth like massive climate changes, meteors hitting, volcanoes.

And therefore looking into the time frame of a hundred years or a few hundred years...there would maybe not any difference be visible.

Answer 3

Everybody seems to hate Bush, but have we forgotten that we TAUGHT the Iraqis to use our weapons and bombs back BEFORE Bush was ever President? I think Al Gore would've wanted us to go in war or at least settle everything in a different way.

But I dont think that would've stopped 9/11 from happening...I mean Al Gore wouldn't of known it was gonna happen-there was no way for America to every know that.

If you look up the training we gave the Iraqis you could see how we were the ones who showed them how to USE our weapons.
Maybe it's our fault, but Iraq needed us then-the terriosts just wanted to use it against us. Just know that some people in Iraq and the rest of the Middle East DO want PEACE.

Answer 4

The law of unintended consequences guarantees that it would be nothing like what you might logically extrapolate. Look at Nixon and Kennedy in the 60's, who would have thought that Kennedy would so v. nearly have caused WW3 or that Nixon would have got us out of Vietnam and made peace w. China?
Gore is a salesman, in some respects an idiot is better suited to the job; look at what Regan accidentally 'achieved' letting his wife's astrologer run the country for his second term.

Answer 5

I definitely think we would have gone about the "war on terror" differently. However, Al Gore does not come across as strong and we need that after the attacks...It is a tough call there...I definitely think his motives would have been more genuine that Bush's.

Answer 6

Always a better place for the working man with a Democrat in office... I have no particular love for Al, but how could things be worse ??? ( I mean, for all us regular blue collar class people...you remember, the class that supports most all the bills, being we have nothing to shield us from the majority of the taxes ???) How would it be better if Pres. Clinton were still in office ???I DO NOT CARE how many blowjobs were distributed, he was a man who had our TRUE INTERESTS at heart... and I remember how different life was then... If Gore was Pres., he would have Mr Clinton to advise him... They could have designated ******* people to service them as long as they had our best interests at heart, for all I care... COME ON, WAKE UP... Do you want fair government or politically correct people who have their favorite interests at heart ??? I vote for the guys that want occasional blowjobs any day....I like occasional blowjobs, too.... God bless Pres. Clinton, he was our friend !!!

Answer 7

Yes. Though I think a chimpanzee could have done a better job than Bush. It's time for Daddy's boy to go back to the ranch.

Answer 8

you are able to blame the incident on Morgan. He delivered all of it on himself. it began whilst he unnecessarily collided with the Cardinals catcher, i don't think of Molina (Yadier) grow to be catching that game. And that sparked the interest along with his code of habit. Even Morgans supervisor apologized to l. a. Russa (Cardinals supervisor) approximately it. Then Morgan does an identical undertaking to the Marlins catcher (do not remember call), then he gets thrown at. are you able to blame them? that's an identical undertaking in any game, you safeguard your teammates. One disrespectful play attracts yet another. which may well be reported in any game, and according to probability its my biasness, yet i don't think of you spot it in hockey as much as the different game. So Volstad throws at Morgan, are you able to blame him? Then his next AB, throws at the back of him. according to probability that section grow to be pointless, yet then Morgan costs the mound. won't be in a position to blame him the two, could furnish your self with protection. Getting hit as quickly as is an illustration, he took his base like he grow to be suppost to. The incident could've ended good there, yet neither facet enable bypass and thats whilst all this got here approximately. So it began with Morgan and pointless performs. are you able to blame it on hockey? unquestionably not. What approximately whilst Sheffield began the Detroit/Cleveland brawl in 08, whos fault grow to be that? Sheffields, he began it whilst he charged the mound. everybody has an physique of thoughts, no be counted what game they play. in case you wanna pin this brawl on hockey, what approximately the different brawls? Afraid that your activities atheletes could have a temper? Suck it up.

Answer 9

Bush is a liar, so i defintely think we would be better!

Answer 10

I don't even want to think about that scenario.