The war in Iraq is about the personal profit of those in the Bush administration, and furthering the agenda of the New World Order.
America is there because the decider decided.
We got from Afghanistan to Iraq, because of oil and NWO agenda.
It has nothing to do with 9/11.
The weapons of mass destruction are being used by America in the form of depleted uranium.
2006-10-02 03:01:36
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The war WAS about getting a secure area in the Middle East, and working on the rest of the area.
Because there was a plan to get Sadam out of power before Bush stole the election (with Rumsfeilds signature on the document)
Start? Back in the 80's the US goverment gave weapons to Sadam (they were friends then) then he used them on his own people, the wmd's the US was looking for were sent to Iran by train a month before the UN inspecters showed up (the sattilate images prove that), that is why the next war will be in IRan, because the goverment knows the wmd's are there now.
The war went from Afgranistan to Iraq because that was the plan all along, Saddam had no intentions of going after the US, but the US had plans to go after them. 9/11 had nothing to do with Saddam, but the US needed an excuse to go after Saddam, 9/11 gave them the "public" reason to go there.
The link below is a 90 min Doc on what is going on. The Bush administration is got a lot of Nixion croonies in there, and look how that ended.
Hold on a little longer, 2008 is almost here.
2006-09-28 20:18:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by J23 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is no link between Al-queda and Saddam Hussein. Saddam was secular, Bin laden is extreme islam, many extreme muslims hated Iraq's secularism, and wanted to topple Saddam.
Some say it was purely about oil, iran, venezula, russia all playing games, US needs a foothold. Colin powell was given a "menu card" of intelligence, based on a alcoholic double agent, who was never actually debriefed by an american, that there were WMD. Post invasion they have not been found.
Some say Iraq neededintervention as Saddam was a very bad man, yet look now how "quiet" bush admin is about the genocide in Darfur, that we all know is going on, but hasn't lifted a finger.
Briefly on Bin laden - he was on the CIA and MI5 bank roll during the cold war fighting the Russian occupation in afghanistan. After Russia got booted out, Im guessing USA etc though they were going to get something in return which didn't happen. US pursues bin laden and get him kicked out of saudi, then sometime later 9/11 occurrs. Interestingly afghanistan was invaded but all the 9/11 bombers were saudis - confused - you should be!
2006-09-28 20:22:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by budda m 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Saddam Hussein was ignoring UN mandates to let weapons inspectors search for illegal WMDs. He was also offering to give $25,000 to the families of suicide bombers in Israel. Being that he had attacked other countries in the past, he was given a date to comply and he ignored it. As usual the UN did nothing, so we went in to remove him from power. After 9/11, we told the world that ether they were with us in the fight or they were against us, there would be no middle ground. He was keeping WMDs, but in the time that the UN was pissing around the WMDs were sent to Syria. We did find 500 bombs that contained nerve gas and we have surveillance video of the weapons being moved.
2006-09-28 20:48:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jack S. Buy more ammo! 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
President Bush with full support from Congress invaded Irag after recieivng incorrect intel (that Congress saw as well) that Saddam had WMD! I again say full support from Congress by a near unamious vote which included yes votes by John Kerry and Joe Lieberman!!
2006-09-28 20:12:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think America wants to get rid of the terriosts and the president claimed they helped with the 9/11
2006-09-28 20:12:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush thinks differently. If he was president in WWII, after the Japanese Bombed Pearl Harbor Bush would have invaded Thailand
2006-09-28 20:14:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
It was meant to show the world how smart Bush is, but it has proved to be what it really is-one of the worst miscalculations in American history.
2006-09-28 20:18:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Tneciter 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Truly, who knows. I think this might be the most occluded administration we've ever had, in a lot of ways.
2006-09-28 20:17:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by niwriffej 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Read, Rule by Secrecy by Jim Marrs.
2006-09-28 20:15:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋