Osama Bin Laden's family (Osama isn't part of it, just his family) funds Bush's oil company in Texas. so if we took out Bin Laden. his family might stop funding. what are your thoughts?
2006-09-28 12:10:47 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
"I don't know where bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
- G.W. Bush, 3/13/02
"I am truly not that concerned about him."
- G.W. Bush, repsonding to a question about bin Laden's whereabouts,
3/13/02 (The New American, 4/8/02)
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him."
- G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
"I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"
- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
2006-09-28 12:16:31 · answer #1 · answered by Kwan Kong 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Bin Laden's family has already publicly disowned him. Didn't you hear?
Although g is right that Bush never seemed to care about Osama. He finally starts talking about him again even after he said that Osama is "not a big deal". Look at the FOX NEWS (Yes, even Fox News admitted it) report right here.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/14/barnes-osama/
2006-09-28 12:11:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Bush, and Bin Laden families have been good friends for many years. I think he's just being used as a scapegoat to keep there unwinnable war on terror going, so as to fulfill their New World Order agenda.
2006-09-28 12:19:38 · answer #3 · answered by oceansoflight777 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I have a hunch that the gov't knows exactly where bin Laden is. But caprturing/killing him would probably lead most people to think the War on Terror is over. Which it clearly won't be for quite some time, unfortunately.
2006-09-28 12:16:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Bin Laden is a non player in the world and not worth our efforts. He is either dead, or will be dead soon. We need to deal with IRAN, and being in IRAQ is the best thing for us. We need a presence in the middle east.
2006-09-28 12:13:58 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they do, they flew his family out of the US and captured some top Al Qaida dogs who would tell them where Osama was. But Bush needed an enemy for his "cowboy saga" so he could win the second term and for $.
2006-09-28 12:19:25 · answer #6 · answered by Got pretzels? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I will tell you this much. I Bin Laden was late on a Discover card payment, he would have been located immediately. Yes, I think that you are correct.
2006-09-28 12:13:10 · answer #7 · answered by Bridget 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Bush said he wasn't too concerned with Bin Laden...
EVEN THOUGH HE'S THE ONLY TERRORIST THAT HE EVER MENTIONS BY NAME AND QUOTES HIM?
go figure?
2006-09-28 12:12:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think we do kow where he is... and I guess we're waiting for the right time to find him and bring him out, or we are just acting like we want to find him and FIGHT AGAINST TERRORISM and it's just a hoax bythe governemtn to do things that they want to do.
2006-09-28 12:13:44 · answer #9 · answered by scshah123 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they knew where his family was when they flew them out of our country right after 911 maybe they could call his family and ask them where he is LOL
2006-09-28 12:14:22 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋