Why don't we question the motives of men in pro-choice?

Question

It has occurred to me that it is quite convenient for men who create unplanned pregnancies to be advocates of pro-choice.
If men are not also responsible for this unborn child then this argument has nothing to do with men and should be a gender specific debate. So, if women are the only ones with any choice to be made (according to pro-choice advocates) then why isn't it a women's only debate?

And further, if only women get the choice of pregnancy then why is any man responsible for the financial support of this child once it is born? If he doesn't have a say on its gestation and it becomes the property of the woman then his role should be done for good. And then further, only women should be able to get tax credits for children.

But, if men are responsible for the financial support of the children they help to create then why are they not also required to approve an abortion procedure?

Answer 1

I guess men's equal rights start after the child is born until then they are screwed just like the unborn, the women becomes the judge jury and executioner. Hay women if you really want to be equal with men give them the equal right to choose life for their child. Ya ,you've come a long way baby.

Answer 2

the concern is that folk desire to play yet not pay. there's a value to each little thing that folk do. Having intercourse with somebody which you do not desire infants with includes a danger. sometimes that danger is between people who're married yet to not one yet another. in the tip it quite is approximately not wanting the duty for one's irresponsible habit. i've got heard the yelps from the pro-camp with regards to getting pregnant whilst raped, incest blah blah., Geting pregnant under those circumstances is uncommon, very uncommon and pales whilst positioned next with the common circumstances, that being entertainment or casual/consentual intercourse. Chilldren are actually not assets, they are not extensions of the mummy; they're people, persons that did not ask to be created. the place is THEIR voice, oh amazing ACLU mouthpiece of the pro-determination crowd? the female had the main appropriate to purely say no up front, and having ssaid particular the criminal duty to take degree against getting pregnant, as did the guy. yet whilst they reported "particular" and have been given pregnant, who paid the priice? The weakest of the bunch- the unborn. who's scuffling with for the rights of people who did not have a call of their introduction? And who's scuffling with to real the lies advised to aborting mothers via the pro-determination crowd? what number females everybody is suffering melancholy and different ills linked with the voluntary termination of a preganncy- adequate women human beings that the numbers might ask your self you. the different component of your question: whilst women everybody is required to PAY infant help and are dealt with as men are in that regard then issues would exchange. the ladies human beings's "rights" human beings like it the two techniques- abortion on call for with men having no say in the deal, or the ensuing infant keeps to be with the "mom" and the guy will pay the help with constrained rights of visitation if any. The stream hailed as inflicting "equivalent rights" became and is predicated upon lies. There ARE inherent ameliorations in women and men human beings. Too undesirable it has purely been at present that psychologists have become brave adequate to communicate out and say so. As consistently, the youngsters- or unborn infants pay the cost for the selfishness of the "adults". There are no loose rides, there is usually a value.

Answer 3

If you want to make a lot of money in life and don't care how you do it, go into the Abortion Field.
People like NOW and Planned Parenthood raise millions of dollars to support abortion. The big shots pay them selves very well. But everyone involved can make a lot of money.
It's a real Money Maker.

Answer 4

Only the woman can - and should - have the choice to abort a pregnancy during the first weeks.
But I strongly feel that the man should have the right to renounce responsibility during that time - or as soon as he's informed.
That would be fair towards both.

Answer 5

This abortion issue can be easily resolved if women will just learn to respect themselves and remember that any man who does not love and respect a woman enough to want to first put a ring on her finger is not worth parting legs to. And if a woman is raped, she simply has to report incident immediately and seek medical help - there does not have to an abortion with today's technology. And to the married: learn to talk out your misunderstandings.

Answer 6

men are denied the choice to keep the baby or not when the woman decides to keep it or not, so men should get the opportunity later to opt out before the birth.

You are exactly right.

The determination of the law in this regard is logically flawed ad gender biased toward women, but necessary to keep the social fabric of society from unravelling due to fathers saying "f___ it" and rolling out, leaving the mothers on social services.

The law is structured this way to keep the cost of social services to single mothers from sky rocketing.

Answer 7

this what brothers me about abortion i think that there should not be abortions done its murder. I think it starts with the teen ages and unwed mothers but there are other options. like adoptions or you can keep the baby if you can afford to. I also feel the unborn baby has rights.

Answer 8

Because this country has long ago abandoned personal responsibility. The country is insane when it comes to abortion.

Answer 9

And what if the man say no to the abortion, but stiffs on child support?

Answer 10

If you really want to reduce the epidemic abortion rate, go after the #1 cause.

The #1 cause of abortion, is, was, and always will be the stigma on unwed mothers from the conservative right.