All ranting, no facts... but for some godless reason they're still around?
2006-09-28 10:40:43 · 23 answers · asked by Aurred 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The same unexplained reasons that George W. Bush won both elections. The American people seem to lack judgment, reasoning, wise decisions, and common sense now days. Seems like they act and think like puppets. Even the media, seems to lack common sense, just to be loyal to one person.
What a joke!
2006-09-28 10:52:00 · answer #1 · answered by manyolito 2 · 7⤊ 5⤋
No, I variety my evaluations on my own beliefs and values. It so takes position that Sarah Palin, Rush Limbaugh, Glenn Beck and Ann Coulter all have lots of an identical beliefs and values that I have yet i do not base what i trust on how they sense. I do have some disagreements with some issues that they are declaring yet in the experience that they informed me that the earth changed into flat, i'd love to do my own analyze to work out if it changed into or no longer if i did not understand already. Why do you ask? Is that the way you come back to a decision what you've faith or no longer: if someone you recognize and recognize tells you what they trust? no longer me. i'm extra of an self sustaining logician with conservative values.
2016-11-25 01:14:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The best thing that ever happened to either one of them is Bill Clinton getting elected. Rush decided early on that Clinton was the worse person ever to be president and hammered him from his first day in office. Never even gave Clinton a chance. Coulter latched onto the Paula Jones legal team and eventually became a whore for the republican party. Clinton had Monica for some relief. Every time Coulter opens her mouth it's to pleasure Bush. I blame people like her and Rush and Hannity and O'Reilly for aggravating the tensions and divisions in this country just so they can put a buck in their G*d damn pockets!
2006-09-28 11:11:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Uhm Ann Coulter backs up all her 'assertions' with references. Never heard Rush, but I would assume he also can cite his sources for his information and/or give examples as does Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly.
Libs spout off but never back their claims. Who is the pea brain who blindly listens to the half-truths conveniently and ever so timely "leaked" to the media....when they can't/won't support their own claims?
2006-09-28 12:56:58 · answer #4 · answered by Cherie 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Easy enough to answer. Pea brains don't believe them because pea brains are libs. The reason Rush is still around is also simple to explain, It's because he tells the truth. I would like to hear about this hoax you are talking about. I don't suppose you could offer any proof of one could you? Talk about ranting.
2006-09-28 11:08:57 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
i'm not on the right, but here's what limbaugh believes:
Limbaugh made the following comments in an op-ed piece in 2005:
I love being a conservative. We conservatives are proud of our philosophy. Unlike our liberal friends, who are constantly looking for new words to conceal their true beliefs and are in a perpetual state of reinvention, we conservatives are unapologetic about our ideals.
* We are confident in our principles and energetic about openly advancing them. We believe in individual liberty, limited government, capitalism, the rule of law, faith, a color-blind society and national security.
* We support school choice, enterprise zones, tax cuts, welfare reform, faith-based initiatives, political speech, homeowner rights and the war on terrorism.
* And at our core we embrace and celebrate the most magnificent governing document ever ratified by any nation — the U.S. Constitution. Along with the Declaration of Independence, which recognizes our God-given natural right to be free, it is the foundation on which our government is built and has enabled us to flourish as a people.
* We conservatives are never stronger than when we are advancing our principles.
2006-09-28 11:18:59 · answer #6 · answered by art 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
They both tell the truth and a lot of people listen to and read them. The libs don't like them since they do tell the truth about the libs and that scares the libs spitless.
2006-09-28 11:25:41 · answer #7 · answered by Jean R 3 · 4⤊ 1⤋
And....you think we "pea-brains" should believe who? You. You should listen to Rush, he usually knows what liberals next move will be before they do. Ann Coulters books are a very good read, but then how would you know?
2006-09-28 10:48:54 · answer #8 · answered by rosi l 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
They play to an audience of repuglicans, repuglicans being the more mentally challenged of the population will believe everything especially if it is repeated over and over. If you listen to Rush on Monday and then not again to Friday, it is the same program with him ranting about the same things. The idiot right wing wannabes will believe it as they have listened everyday.
2006-09-28 10:58:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
You just proved libs wouldn't know a fact if it kicked them in the a**
2006-09-28 11:42:57 · answer #10 · answered by thomasnotdoubting2 3 · 2⤊ 2⤋