beckham or lampard?

Question

my vote is lampard.

Answer 1

they are are/have been talented players. personally, i like lampard better in terms of football, but they are/were both great players.

Answer 2

Beckham AND Lampard - both are extremely useful and useable for ENGLAND National Team - opponents, games come in a variety of different styles of play. Beckham the "master deliverer" can get results for England; likewise Lampard's midfield strikes. Beckham is still too good to be ignored.

Answer 3

At the moment its clearly Lampard. But Lampards in the peak of his career.


In his peak Beckham was much better down the wing, he had a knack for big goals and was one of the best passers and free kick experts. he was a key member of Uniteds winning teams of the 90's and without a doubt until the recent form of C. Ronaldo, he was sorely missed as an assist producer by United. He is now in the twilight of his career but he was just as important as Lampard in his day.

Answer 4

Lampard is not fit to play at England. How did he perform at the World Cup? absolutely vulnerable and at club level even if he scores goals , all are deflected ones.
Mclaren did a poor selection of dropping Beckham. He had provided many crosses and even scored a goal for himself in the world cup whereas Lampard came away with nothing.
He could have atleast kept Beckham on the bench. England would have not qualified for the 2002 world cup if Beckham had not scored a fantastic free-kick against Greece in the qualifiers.That would have been a shame for England if they had'nt qualified for the prestigious World cup. I don't think Lampard is fit enough to play for his country.

Answer 5

My vote is for Beckham. Did you watch how bad Lampard played during the world cup. He had so many opputunities to score and he let everyone pass by. I think he's a little overrated.

Answer 6

i'm one in each of those last few who nonetheless believes that Lampard and Gerrard can play at the same time interior the same team. that is purely that the two are attacking-orientated gamers that frequently their roles have been given switched up and knotted up altogether, Capello would desire to discover the only formation that he and the two the gamers understand which will artwork, as for Beckham, he's a brilliant midfield participant no count if on the flanks or interior the process the park yet Walcott is staking his declare interior the britain squad with each game long gone, in all fairness I nonetheless think of Becks can do a activity for us together with his huge adventure and staggering passing means and that i actual think of that grow to be why Capello extra Becks on interior the final 15 - 20 minutes of the recent game... to tidy up the passes in midfield and deliver greater of those pin element crosses into the Kazakh container.

Answer 7

i vote for gerrard..hehehe

i think for right now lampard is better than beckham..

as u know they both are good, but maybe bcoz now becks is older than b4,he's quite bad..n his part to his team is not so big like lampard job in chelsea...

after 3/4 years lampard can give his best performances to his club,after he's bought from wesham..

but, becks has not already given his best performances for his team yet..
coz after he's bought from manchester utd to realmadrid..

n this fact is getting hard after becks is not called by steve mclaren to angland team..

so i think, now lampad is better than bekcs..


but, gerrard is still the best...hehehe

Answer 8

Frank Lampard, anyday.
As a player, he's got a more rounded repertoire of skills and he shows more professionalism in his overall conduct, on and off the pitch.

Answer 9

Lampard for me.

Answer 10

Now it would be Lampard as Becks is fading, but in terms of all round contribution to football in England its got to be Becks.