2006-09-28 09:44:37 · 61 answers · asked by shsimon 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
bush is worse than hitlar.
hitlar looks like a man
bush not.
hitalr was smart
bush not.
if hitlar is alive today, he'll become bush's assitant secretay of state, tony blair already hold bush's secretary of state position, is it not?
2006-09-28 09:56:08 · answer #1 · answered by asru 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
No. Bush doesn't give a damn about the environment, unlike Hitler, Bush is the puppet of the jewish lobby, and Hitler's dad didn't get him out of military service during a war!
Like Hitler, Bush claims to be a Christian, he likes dogs, and he doesn't drink (at least, anymore!)
But, seriously, even though Cheney and his cabal are turning the US into a National Socialist state that wants to rule the world -- Bush is just a fugurehead, a face on the media -- and even though the Bush Adminstration is antidemocratic and acts like a dictatorship, with all the presidential signing statements making the executive above the law, while running secret Gestapo torture cells, and now wanting to be able to hold people in prison indefinitely without trial, their plan is to control all the resources and enslave most people in the world, not to purify humanity for the benefit of the "master race" by systematically murdering millions of people because of they were jewish, gypsies, disabled, or eastern european.
But, while we are on the subject, has anyone notice how US army helmets are starting to look more and more like Nazi Stormtroopers helmets?
2006-09-28 11:54:32 · answer #2 · answered by karlrogers2001 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Hitler may of killed 6/7 million over a short period of time. However Bush and his predecessors have killed a hell of a lot more innocent people since the end of the second world war. Four million between 1963 - 75 in Vietnam, up to 2 million in Iraq since the first Gulf war, bearing in mind Iraq has been bombed on a daily basis since. Thousands in Afghanistan, Thousands in Nicaragua, Panama etc...
If evil is judged by a body count, then American foreign policy is far more evil than the Third Reich.
2006-09-28 10:02:00 · answer #3 · answered by Simon J 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
For wanting to remove a dictator, instill democracy, fight terrorism domestically and internationally and protect the Judaic people? Erm, I think President Bush is about as far removed from Hitler as a man can be. Those that think otherwise should really stop listening to Rupert Murdock Media Inc or at least be more impartial.
2006-09-28 21:58:23 · answer #4 · answered by AaronO 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not a chance. Hitler had most of the country behind him when he came to power. George had to get his brother to fix the vote in Florida so he could crawl past the winning post. As far as "Taking over the World" there is little difference, but the dictators now are the big Corporations and their greed. For Gestapo read "Homeland Security" both had and have the power to remove people from society without any redress or legal representation. As for the war crimes, well I"ll let you make your own mind up.
2006-09-28 10:17:36 · answer #5 · answered by researcher 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well look at the facts... Has he slaughtered 4. something million Jews? No, Tried to expand his empire by sheer military force? No, Is he a Vegitarian? No Got a weird looking tash? No
He is not a tyrant, A murderer, He is however a bad president and needs to sort things out, mainly Iraq/Afghanistan by withdrawing troops and to let Iraq run their own country, The same goes for Blair, there are more important issues at home that need to be dealt with.
2006-09-28 21:06:38 · answer #6 · answered by vampire_o3 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no bush is not the new hitler, for a start hitler was a very good leader and a very good war monger hitler also built germany back up to its former glory after WW1 hilter created jobs and oppertunities for all german ppl, ok yeah he did do alot of evil stuff like killing jews cuz they are jews and disabled ppl also cuz they werent rite for his country and he oppressed women but no bush isnt the new hilter bush is just a dummy who doesnt even know how to pronuouce NUCLEAR
2006-09-29 00:10:33 · answer #7 · answered by joeq1987 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
STOP!...and think. It shows how a whole country and world can be fooled.How can a man who is intelectualy as dumb as George W.Bush,an ex-alcoholic lead a country?.The "facts"dont add up.If the U.S government isn't rigged and run by people we don't see and here about...NWO,Skulls and Bones, ZIONISTS then Spongebob Squarepants really exists! Bush Jnr is not the new Hitler,Germany was behind Hitler,He was a GREAT speaker.America is not behind Bush Jnr.And he is definetly not a speaker...Hes a JOKER.
2006-09-28 14:11:03 · answer #8 · answered by tam cowan 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well unless George Bush has forwarded a national elimination of all non-aryan people then I guess NO! ARe you crazy? Gosh, what is wrong with some Americans Today? You jump to so many conclusions and make so many OUTRAGEOUS points and don't even bring up BOTH SIDES OF THE STORY. Sure George Bush ain't PERFECT but he's doing a better job than Kerry would of.
2006-09-28 09:56:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
No: Actually there's Some of his Supporters thought that Bill Clinton was the New Hilter well Coming from an Independent stand Point Clinton would be more Capable of Abusing Power, Bush Ovisiuosly Doesn't Know How to Make Peace.
Bush is Might as Well be the New Absent Mined Professior but He is No Nazi, so don't Feel so bad about Our President.
2006-09-28 09:58:39 · answer #10 · answered by tfoley5000 7 · 1⤊ 6⤋
Bush is a lot of things: illiterate, war mongering, vexing, slow, greedy, unethical, moronic... but Hitler I don't think so. Bush is a bastard alright, but attempted mass genocide of an entire race? Wait a minute... there is Iraq to consider, although Iraqis are a nationality, not a race.
2006-09-28 09:49:41 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋