Is it right to get married with a person just because that person is rich, does love have also to do with money?
2006-09-28 09:26:32 · 9 answers · asked by Claudio F 1 in Business & Finance ➔ Careers & Employment
you want to make sure you can afford to live,
but you should not marry for money if you want happiness.
you should marry because that person makes you happy,
and you them
because you can share your life in richer, and poorer.
if someone is rich, and they get sick,
they may loose all their money,
or a stock crash, or any number of things.
do you still want to be married if that happens?
but if you marry based on inside things, they will not disapear,
and you will be happy for a long time,
if that rich person gets tired of you, how easy would it be for them to get rid of ( divorce) you? leaving you with a prenup that adds up to zip
2006-09-28 09:37:07 · answer #1 · answered by papeche 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's no such rule in getting married for the reason of richness. Nobody could sue one if they'll learn about it. But the fact of righteousness, it's really LOVE that should bind partners with no hidden agenda or extra intentions.
LOVE is too deep to be engaged with money. It is something that money couldn't buy. It is a feeling that lasts while money is a material thing at a moment you could have but once spent, no more left.
Getting married is your choice --- with or without love... Just be ready to face the consequences of being engaged on such scenario ;)
Paula
BDO
Global Sky Inc
www.global-sky.com
2006-09-28 09:37:39 · answer #2 · answered by paula b 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Status has to do with love, in our society that means money. On a smaller more personal level it means personal aesthetics and muscle build, with a low fat level. It's good advice never to mix career with relationships, and to be politically correct one would say never to marry for riches. Although in actuality. Either one of the two would be acceptable if they made you truly happy.
2006-09-28 09:34:35 · answer #3 · answered by Answerer 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your first question has nothing to do with the explanation. I work together with my husband, so we share a career and a life, but money didn't play any role in our relationship (basically because we have the same - low - financial status more or less).
2006-09-28 09:31:29 · answer #4 · answered by cpinatsi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you're talking about is not what the quote means. The quote is to mean you're not supposed to fool around with the people you work with. creating relationships with people while at work tends to make huge problems when things turn out sour, or if the both of you wind up having to compete against each other.
2006-09-28 09:29:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is good to keep work and relationships seperate. No, it's a bad to marry someone only because they have money - unless you want to spend your life with their bank statements.
2006-09-28 09:36:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
U reported u dont desire a mediocre existence going to protection rigidity would be a stable option to shield ur existence yet I easily have much less concept in regards to the fee and stuff and desire to speculate in assets that field is in strengthen
2016-10-18 03:47:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
never settle for less when you r in a relationship. if money is what your after thats wrong but if your in love than the money issue wont be a worry
2006-09-28 09:31:24 · answer #8 · answered by mari 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Kid, you are so confused it isn't worth explanation.
2006-09-28 09:36:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋