Yes it is correct grammar and as long as you're trying to portray that something is possible you've said it right too. Good luck!
2006-09-28 09:17:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by ms pokeylope 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yet, for some reason unbeknownst to mankind, the blinking cursor that I see while I am typing tells me that yes, that is correct grammar.
2006-09-28 16:10:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
sounds like it to me.
Several pundits have stated that Hilary Clinton will not run for President in the next election. Yet, I do not see it as an impossibility.
2006-09-28 16:16:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by xamayca.com 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, it's just another way of saying "I don't see that this is impossible."
2006-09-28 16:52:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-28 16:16:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ronald G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-28 16:16:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by stumble__replay 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes.
2006-09-28 16:09:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by ♥ady_8e_80♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes -- though there are alternatives that are also grammatically correct. These two also work:
Yet, I do not see it as impossible.
Yet, I see it as a possibility
Yet I see it as possible.
Each says the same thing -- though their connotations differ slightly.
2006-09-28 16:53:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Ranto 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yes the double negative would imply that it IS a possibility
2006-09-28 16:13:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by perfect_union2001 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
Yep.
2006-09-28 16:25:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by mrearly2 4
·
0⤊
0⤋