Both parties will agree the house and senate have let down the American people...?

Question

So why do we keep re-electing these clowns? Isn't it time for term limits in the house and senate?

Answer 1

We have built in term limits every election day. People have to stop voting party and start voting ideas. We keep re-electing them because "it's not my person" mentality.

Answer 2

I agree we have been let down by both parties. However I do not agree with term limits even for the president. Roosevelt knew he was the first to be elected 4 times, and wanted to be the only one. That is why he allowed the limits. What if by some strange accident we elected a person as President the united the house, and the senate, protected our shores and eliminated poverty in this country, then the world. Would we really want to take a chance and then next guy screwing it all up. I know I went a little overboard but in the house and the senate what if that one person was elected that made a differance. I know I would want them to stay in there or run for higher office.

Answer 3

No time restrictions on house and senate, but the eight-year limit on the Presidency is a godsend.

Answer 4

In general I am opposed to term limits becuase it means we lose the good ones too. All branches of the federal government has let me down since the GOP controls all of them right now.

Answer 5

No undesirable concept , the two the Dem's and repub's could desire to end with the infantile game that they are fidgeting with the yankee peopels stay and start up doing what they replace into elected to do , GOVERN . a sparkling poll skill that voters are no longer delighted by skill of the belief of medical wellness insurance mandates and not utilising a public selection or a Medicare growth. performed by skill of learn 2000 for the known replace marketing campaign Committee (%.) and Democracy for united statesa. (DFA), the survey famous in easy terms 33 p.c. of in all probability voters desire a wellness care bill that would not contain a public medical wellness insurance selection and would not strengthen Medicare, yet does require all human beings to get medical wellness insurance. extremely greater Democrats -- 37 p.c. -- desire the belief, on an identical time as in easy terms 30 p.c. of Republicans and 31 p.c. of independents do. meanwhile, if the common public selection and Medicare purchase-in are further, fifty 8 p.c. of human beings help the belief. The sort of Republican supporters drops to 22 p.c., yet self sustaining help rises to fifty seven p.c. and Democratic help to a whopping 88 p.c.. "This poll exhibits voters in finished-blown insurrection against the Senate bill," suggested %. co-founder Stephanie Taylor. "in easy terms one-third of voters help mandates and not utilising a public selection, on an identical time as almost 2-thirds desire the common public selection and Medicare growth. this could be a catastrophe of epic proportions for Democrats in 2010 if it is not fastened -- quickly." yet another recent poll commissioned by skill of the %. and DFA discovered that one third of Democrats are much less in all probability to vote in 2010 if the wellness care bill would not contain a public selection.

Answer 6

Yes to all the above! We limit our President - why shouldn't the others be limited?!

Answer 7

I vote fire them all, Reps and Dems. Lets get someone who actually is trying to do what we hired them to do and not sit on thier fat A$$es and not solve the largest issues in the country.