English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

during the Victorian era, women considered it fashionable to shave off their eyebrows and pluck off their eyelashes completely.

u'll see a lot of old pictures/ portraits of girls without any facial hair if u search on the net for Victorian pics

2006-09-28 08:12:43 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Mack Sennett answer is probable--video clips had (and function) a competent result on common way of existence, as on a similar time as undershirt sales plummeted after Clark Gable did not placed on one in It have been given right here approximately One night. i've got have been given learn that for the time of the previous 1915, prostitutes have been the team known for shaving. the government reasons women shave are aesthetics, heady scent, and custom. hairy armpits on an in any diverse case groomed lady, somewhat on a similar time as she's donning something like a sleeveless ballgown, seem unkempt, unsophisticated, and earthy--a extra hippy seem than frequently needed. in the event that they're moist with sweat, even worse. Hair additionally traps heady scent, so which you 're going to have extra BO as quickly as you're unshaven. and 0.33, culturally there's a EWWW element--we are purely not used to seeing it. Shaving the legs is done strictly for stylish reasons--hair below nylons gets all bunched up and ruins the graceful seem of the leg, and long, darkish leg hair seems masculine. The aesthetics have lots to do with reaching an phantasm of maximal youthfulness, as talked approximately by utilising way of a few appropriate right here. women frequently settle directly to seem sparkling and girlish, and actual do not settle directly to invite comparisons with an previous, hairy guy.

2016-12-15 16:14:59 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Actually at that time, it was considered beautiful for women to remove most of their facial hair (including eyebrows and eyelashes).

2006-09-28 07:56:17 · answer #3 · answered by BarBQer 2 · 0 0

I thought she had very thin ones

2006-09-28 07:59:24 · answer #4 · answered by GD-Fan 6 · 0 1

she had but very small so they were not visible

2006-09-28 08:01:19 · answer #5 · answered by siddharth 3 · 0 1

she had it very mild...not seen easily

2006-09-28 07:53:06 · answer #6 · answered by Deens 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers