having all these magaines around? they are litterally all the same. i cant tell the difference between the cover pages.
they all have their names in pink, slightly slanted, with a 'celeb' in the same on place. usually the same 'celeb'
2006-09-28 07:11:45 · 39 answers · asked by tubs 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Magazines
I would love to know when precisely "celeb" became a word.
2006-10-02 04:06:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I absolutely loath magazines like Hello!, OK, very condescending and trite.Why would I want to see into some wannabe/has beens house or want to look/dress/live like them?
I stick to the more intelligent informative reads such as Psychologies where self development is more useful than reading about some celebs drug/dietary habits or what they wore at a wedding and how much it cost.
I feel sorry for the trees which are wasted in the production of this tat.
2006-09-30 06:36:56 · answer #2 · answered by dinahmite 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Great question. I am so sick of seeing the same old faces on them every other week. Inside they are all the same. Problems with celebs, soap updates, and as for people telling their stories to thes mags..... well all I can say is what kind of people are they to put their children if they have any through that. Kids in school can be very cruel to one another.
2006-10-01 10:51:54 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The weekly women's mags industry is trying to evolve. A couple of magazines have been launched this year aimed at women who are more interested in current affairs then celeb gossip. This hopefully will be a good trend because not every woman is interested in the Big Brother rejects or reading what's in every other magazine.
2006-09-30 11:38:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sick and tired of all of them. We are ready for a new kind of magazine, which prints interesting, in-depth interviews with talented young (or old) people, which gives us real news, not simply repeated gossip, and makes for a more engrossing, interesting read.
Better journalists and editors needed, a nice clean modern look, good photographs and something to get one's teeth into.
And nobody from Big Brother.
2006-09-30 05:44:55 · answer #5 · answered by simon2blues 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The whole Anglo-American obsession with celebrities is utterly pathetic. For pity's sake, haven't people got better things to worry about than who's fat, thin or has sweat rings? Why would anybody in their right mind pay even a penny to read this drivel?
2006-09-29 10:55:50 · answer #6 · answered by FrozenCamel 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont bother wiv these sort of mags. instead read a mag called Kerrang! I read this one cos you never have the same 2 mag covers. By the way this mag is a rock mag.
I carnt be botherd wiv pairis Hilton and the rest of the barbie doll world.
2006-09-29 00:08:02 · answer #7 · answered by Rose 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People, OK!, US Weekly, In Touch, Life & Style, Star-------they all have the same stories and same celebrities. It's starting to get really old. Some of the pics are identical too. Lame!
2006-09-28 19:54:02 · answer #8 · answered by Steph 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sick sore and tired seeing the same old faces and the same old problems, on the front covers, 99.9 per cent of celebrities are the most boring people in real life.
2006-09-28 07:26:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I learnt that a long time ago, one mag will do as they all have the same articles. I think they copy each other.
Also the big closseys are a real waste as they are just adverts. Why peoply pay for them at all I don't know.
2006-10-02 01:51:51 · answer #10 · answered by smiley 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
MY sister is the worse for it one week theres a story about a girl whos husband died and left her to pay all her bills in one mag and the next week its the same in a different mag omg how silly
2006-10-01 09:34:16 · answer #11 · answered by ciaran91 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋