English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-09-28 07:09:18 · 3 answers · asked by david c 4 in Politics & Government Politics

instead spending trillions on iraq.

2006-09-28 07:09:50 · update #1

3 answers

Cut funding? He disbanded the unit...wiped it out completely. Could it have something to do with the $14 million Bin Laden's brother invested in Bush businesses during the 90's? Could it be that the Saudis/Bin Ladens are major shareholders in Carlisle Group/Haliburton? Could it be that as long as Osama is on the loose Bush and Cheney have a convenient "boogie man" to scare the voters with?

All of the above plus?

2006-09-28 07:17:03 · answer #1 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0 1

Because Bush is building a gas pipeline in Afghanistan and getting natural gas from Afghanistan.
If Osama bin Laden is found then he wouldn't have a reason to be in Afghanistan.
He doesn't want to get Osama.
If Osama is caught then he will not have a reason to continue his war on terror and invade innocent countries.
War on terror, ever thought about how many people get killed by a terror attack in the US. More people get killed by a hurricane or a robbery.
And so much of our money and freedom spent for this nonsense.

I sometimes think it could have been Bush who did the 9/11 because if you think who profited mostly from the 9/11 attacks it was the Bush administration

2006-09-28 14:17:51 · answer #2 · answered by Mr Business 3 · 1 0

thanks for listing sources.

2006-09-28 14:13:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers