Right now they are trying to give the Bush Admin. a hard time for not doing enough before 9/11/01, but have spent the past 4 years giving the them a hard time for going too far with the Patriot Act, terrorist interrogation methods, and anything else that helps us beat Al Quaida?
2006-09-28 06:35:41 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
The answer is simple: Democrat = hypocrite. Do as I say and not as I do. They're great at sitting around and pointing out what's wrong with the world, but since all they do is sit around and criticize they don't know how to fix it because they don't DO anything. They wear their rose-colored glasses and say "In a perfect world, this is how it would be..." all the time failing to see what is plainly obvious to the rest of the planet: THIS IS NOT A PERFECT WORLD. They love to point out the faults of other people and tell them how to live their lives, but when you point the finger at them, their response is "Who are you to tell me how to run my life?" Want a perfect illustration of how bass-ackwards liberals are? Here you have a group of people who champion animal rights and carry banners that say "Meat is Murder," but when you ask them about unborn children, their response is "My body, my choice." What's wrong with this picture?
2006-09-28 06:51:06 · answer #1 · answered by sarge927 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The 9/11 comminsions proposals that bush refuses to follow take away none of our freedoms and doesn't violate any laws but bush believes he is above the law and can do what he wants. We don't want it both ways you can beat Al Quaida by following the law why can't you idiot neocons understand that and your first answer to everything is torture. We survived two world wars without doing it but all of a sudden we need it?
2006-09-28 06:44:33 · answer #2 · answered by region50 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no longer truly both recommendations they choose a Public selection and something concerning authorities Its having It both recommendations Its Having the authorities in contact it truly is the objective,shouldn't enable Republicans Doing This because like In Massachusetts Romney changed into attempting get on Liberals reliable side, no longer to diminish expenses or Telling human beings to save their coverage. I say Democrats comprehend better effective then Romney on accepted well being care
2016-12-06 07:54:47 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They aren't. If they had opposed the invasion of Afghanistan then you'd have a point. Don't confuse trying to protect the Constitution and the Civil Liberties of Americans with not wanting to catch Bin Laden.
We want to get the terrorists as much as you do. We just don't think we have to sacrifice everything America supposedly stands for to do it!
Oh, and Stifle, try it you might like it! LOL
2006-09-28 06:41:03 · answer #4 · answered by Skippy 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Oh,you mean like Republicans blaming Clinton now for 9-11,but spent the 90s doing nothing but worrying about his sex life?
Stifle yourself-I dont like it YOU.Fair enough?
2006-09-28 06:40:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Flip, Flop. Flip, Flop. Flip, Flop. That's the sound of a Democrat trying to get elected.
2006-09-28 06:39:01 · answer #6 · answered by Leah 6 · 4⤊ 3⤋
They like it both ways sexually too.
Leah is right,their party symbol should be a fish,not a jackass.
Who cares?Jim.
2006-09-28 06:40:07 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
they are ac/dc
2006-09-28 06:40:51 · answer #8 · answered by Super Shiraz 3 · 4⤊ 2⤋
don't get mislead by the republican side
2006-09-28 06:38:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
they want whatever will get them votes.
2006-09-28 06:38:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋