politics is dirty any way you cut it.
2006-09-28 05:55:12
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr.happy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
He had no choice but to admit to it. The other alternative is to deny it and let it drag out. Its nothing more than political spin control. It wasn't like he had a crisis of conscience.
Besides it doesn't matter if he admitted to it or not. Bottom line is he was wrong and he performed the same type of act while in office.
2006-09-28 05:59:30
·
answer #2
·
answered by This Is Not Honor 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Of course they won't, they'll just sweep it under the carpet like all the rest of their shenanigans. Now, he may have a tough battle ahead for his seat. But of course this stuff isn't big news. If it had been a demo, we would have been hearing about it for weeks. This is probably the only mention we'll get of this one.
Omission is the same as lying, at least thats what I try to teach my daughter. It was a five year affair, that's five years of omission. He also tried to strangle her, oh yeah, but that doesn't count. Even though I would have to say that attempted murder is way worse than lying under oath. The problem is Clinton should have never been asked question like that. I 'm sure if your buddy had been confronted in the spotlight about it, he would have lied.
2006-09-28 05:50:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
maximum of them no longer, simply by fact they're self righteous hypocritical and sociopathic. they actually think of they did the marvelous factor whilst certainly they have sinned. If Jesus is a guy of peace , it extremely is what i pick to have self belief they're headed in the present day for hell beginning with Bush, Cheney, Palin. If God is warlike as pronounced interior the previous testomony, then they could finally end up in heaven, inspite of the incontrovertible fact that the entire concept of hell or heaven is numerous bull.
2016-12-12 16:48:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are good and bad people in every walk of life.
It just so happens that when a Republican does this sort of thing we don't applaud it like liberals do.
No one in our party is PROUD of Gary Hart.
Can you say the same for Bill, "hand me that cigar" Clinton?
2006-09-28 05:47:34
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It wasn't his sex life. It was lying on a sworn affidavit. Why can't pinhead liberals understand the difference. BTW, unlike Clinton, this guy is owning up to it.
2006-09-28 05:47:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I think the choking aspect is alarming.
2006-09-28 06:05:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by CJ 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's only wrong when a Dem does it!
Haven't the Cons been clear on this?
2006-09-28 05:46:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
At least he didn't lie about it like your whittle hot-headed wbuddy,"Slick Willie" Clinton.
2006-09-28 05:50:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
one diference there big guy, he admitted to it.
remember "I did not ahve sexual relations with that woman"
2006-09-28 05:46:48
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋