If our founding fathers hadn't committed treason then we wouldn't have the constitution, so it can be a good thing right? Heck a great thing sometimes.........
2006-09-28 05:32:17 · 11 answers · asked by The Angry Stick Man 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The US was born out of the need for freedom and democracy.
2006-09-28 05:38:17 · answer #1 · answered by Ha Ha Charade You Are................... 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. American revolutionaries were Patriots.
2. Israeli freedom fighters 1n1948 were the Zionist underground
3. Bolshevik proletariat defeated the cruel Czarist monarchs.
4. National Socialism in Germany overthrew the stagnant oppressed republic.
5. Hamas represents the majority of palistinians and is fighting for freedom.
6. Hezbollah is the benefactor of poor muslins and protects them from Israeli atrocities.
7. Castro heroiclly defeated the dictator Batista and liberated the Cuban people.
I guess a move to treason depends on who you are how bad you are getting screwed.
2006-09-28 05:52:55 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Read the Declaration of Independence. As is stated there, there is an implied contract between a king and his subjects. King George III violated that contract and deserved to be deposed. Being that the colonists were 3000 miles away without any way of deposing the king, they considered themselves free of that contract and went their own way. Had the British Army been able to crush the rebellion, I venture to say that many necks would have been stretched after being found guilty of treason.
2006-09-28 05:43:15 · answer #3 · answered by mzJakes 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sometimes treason is a good thing. The only difference between being a traitor and being a patriot is who wins the war. Both have to be willing to die for what they believe.
2006-09-28 06:02:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
treason? they didnt committ treason! they were colonies that consisted of more than just english men. what about the people who were born here in native american soil? the King had treated them unjustly! and they didnt committ treason, cause thats like sneaking around and going behind their backs. No, they got together and signed a declaration of independance from britian.
2006-09-28 05:44:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Funny. I've often wondered the same thing. I mean how can traitors to the crown list treason as the ONLY crime in the Constition which is punishable by death when they were traitors themselves. Kinda ironic. Don't ya think?
2006-09-28 06:39:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you are advocating treason for the sake of treason? My ancestors were raped by the mongols and as a result I am here but that still does not mean I am going to endorse pillaging and raping.
2006-09-28 05:37:32 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
nicely treaties won't be able to pass adversarial to the structure, so he won't be able to attempt this, yet we are fascinated about a lot of treaties in which our federal regulation or state guidelines are outmoded through international regulations, set typically circumstances through the UN. we received't be compelled to hitch a treaty, yet we may be able to voluntarily pass into them. That being stated, i do no longer imagine that we ought to connect any variety of treaty which comprises us paying some variety of international tax to some entity like the international monetary company or IMF or something else. in reality, Im quite certain that this complete international warming stuff is only a huge hoax, and is an attempt to regulate human beings besides as tax them.
2016-10-16 02:42:05 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If the King had treated the USA like he treated the Canadian colonies, there never would have been a rebellion
2006-09-28 05:37:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
only if the end justifies the means.
2006-09-28 05:41:48 · answer #10 · answered by Cyrus 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋