English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The Bush total Body Count for dead Iraqis is higher than Saddams numbers Proof that Bush is better than Saddam.

2006-09-28 05:13:16 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Hey sombody else:

The body counts are on the DOD website. Unless the Department of defense is not giving us the right numbers.

Why would they want to inflate the body count unless they want the Commander and chief to look like a better killer.

2006-09-28 05:46:05 · update #1

Jerry Saddams body count is a mater of evidence in his trial.

This is public information. I don't care what you liberals say Bush is the best Killer

2006-09-28 05:47:49 · update #2

Bobby D: We are not talking about FDR or Gingus Khan it is simply Mano on Mano Bush out killed Saddam

2006-09-28 05:49:23 · update #3

Captain 2: This isn't the special olympics. Bush is doing a better job than Saddam. I don't care what your liberal media tells you. Bush has out killed Saddam that makes him a better president.

2006-09-28 05:55:57 · update #4

Calle: You must have been ridding the short bus. In war the guy that kills the most people wins.

This isn't "T" ball where everyone goes out for pizza after the game.

2006-09-28 06:02:26 · update #5

Turbowedgee:

See how you liberals hate America. You said, "It is sad that the Democrats are so morally and intellectually bankrupt they have to lie, smear and distort to advance their agenda. "

See you will even defend Saddam and call his score a lie to disparage Bush.

Facts are facts Bush is the clear winner in the dead Iraqi contest.

2006-09-28 06:06:15 · update #6

14 answers

Interesting way of judging leadership ability.
I would have gone with # of civilians killed personally, but I guess soldiers killed is a good method too.

2006-09-28 05:17:24 · answer #1 · answered by El Pistolero Negra 5 · 3 1

He's ineffective as the achievement of his unilateral Iraq War has accomplished exactly the OPPOSITE of its own stated goals. Just take a look at the recently declassified intelligence report. You can only deny reality & facts for so long.....don't be an ostrich....get that head out of the sand.

2006-09-28 05:21:11 · answer #2 · answered by captain2man 3 · 2 1

Mission Accomplished!

2006-09-28 05:23:31 · answer #3 · answered by CJ 2 · 0 1

So, you mean, the person who causes the most death wins?
I thought it was supposed to be the other way around.
But, let me make it very simple. I thought the idea of a strong
America was to settle & fix problems with the Least amount
of casualities.

2006-09-28 05:22:30 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Harping "We were deceived!" is merely an excuse to get votes now that the known public sentiment has grew to change into hostile to the Iraqi occupation. even as patriotic fervor gripped the collective, feeble-minded public, maximum Democrats were all too prepared to hop on the bandwagon with a view to stay away from being labelled "anti-American traitors" after Bush's "with us or hostile to us" speech. you could not truly blame them for retracting, because it has now paid political dividends.

2016-12-06 07:47:59 · answer #5 · answered by popek 3 · 0 0

Well, i dont think he is great cause of his lead in killings...
But he is great cleaning up all the mess & bull crap clinton left for him. Now that America is doing something, all the liberals are crapping bricks...i love it!

2006-09-28 11:37:31 · answer #6 · answered by k-mac 3 · 0 1

[sigh] I will futilely ask if you happen to have [ever] any actual data that supports your obvious lie?

It is sad that the Democrats are so morally and intellectually bankrupt they have to lie, smear and distort to advance their agenda.

2006-09-28 05:40:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Do you fault FDR for killing tens of thousands of our men and women during WW2? How about Harry Truman for killing thousands of innocent Japanese citizens?

Hypocrite.

2006-09-28 05:20:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Do you have numbers to back that up? Thought not. With out the facts why don't you just shut up? Another fool.

2006-09-28 05:19:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

You are very ill informed about Sadam !

2006-09-28 05:19:19 · answer #10 · answered by jerry4_fun 2 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers