English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Ok here is how it will go if you are pro life and u want to defend your views that is fine. However, it is up to you to defend your views without any religious intent and no quoting to bible. So what i am saying is that u have to defend your view without using any type of religious views. If you are pro choice i want to here from u and the same rules apply to you as well.

personally i am pro choice but i have never met a pro life person that can defend their views without using their religion....so im interested in hearing what u have to say....

If u plan saying that abortion is murder scientifcally tell me that a embyo, fetus is a life,,,,make sure u really know what your talking about and references are much apprecitated

2006-09-28 03:59:54 · 16 answers · asked by coopchic 5 in Social Science Gender Studies

i guess i shouldn't be surprised by some of the pro life answers because no one has givin me one scientific answer yet.... im dissappointed...... u can be pro life and believe in scientifc factors as well u know

2006-09-28 04:13:22 · update #1

babs_2319 i appreciate the defense and i agree it is a contradiction...to say that it is murder and then say u want to kill me wow how mental is that....they have meds for that u know..

2006-09-28 04:22:49 · update #2

16 answers

My Dear:

Lets start with the cell

Definition:

1. biology basic unit of living thing: the smallest independently functioning unit in the structure of an organism, usually consisting of one or more nuclei surrounded by cytoplasm and enclosed by a membrane. Cells also contain organelles such as mitochondria, lysosomes, and ribosomes.( Which means is working and alive to survive and be called live cell) If the organelles inside are not working it is consider a dead cell.


Let start with the cell. When two living units, one called sperm and one called ovulum get together with the genetic material DNA form a zygote 1
Definition: the cell resulting from the union of an ovum and a spermatozoon (including the organism that develops from that cell) . Can you believe that both together are already alive, they are alive because there is only reproductoin in life cycles and mathematical results as well as in the scientific method..

Reproduction of cell is mitosis. and that is the stage when the cell will form the embryo. It is so simple that even dummies in science can know that an embryo and the zygote are life already.

Since life gives birth to life even cancer cells can be reproduced, you can cultivate them in right environment in petri dishes. Cell is the basic unit of life 'cause its alive itself. It would be different is the sperm or any cell is dead, then there wont be reproduction and ethically, a dead embryo taken out is a natural abortion.

I'm pro-life, perform science research and do not believe in abortion unless is life treatening for the mother, we have to have an open mind, not to see things in only one perspective. I believe in the Bible, but I wanted to prove you that scientifically, a cell is life. That is why I consider vicious abortion a crime, but believe too that God sees every heart and understand every single situation.

I'm not to judge but to advice, and to present you my point of view and my scientifical point of view, which is the one you wanted. Hope that this help you. Good luck with other points of view. It is nice to see what people expose in an objective way.

Even Cardiac tissue can be keep alive in the right media, without being inside a body, some cardiac cells die too. Isn't it wonderfull to know that the first organ formed is the heart and the spinal cord, then everything else. The difference between dead or a life cell can explain why reprodution equals life. When frozen cells are dead for the In vitro fertilizaton they are thrown away in the biohazard containment, that is why for an in vitro fertilizatoin you need alive cells, a frozen but living embryo, that when implanted your womb will nurture and nourish with you own body fluids. The embryo depends on life to survive, that is why, when doing and IVF they implant at least 5 embryos, because the drastic change of environment can kill some and only a few will surviveand depend totally of the mother to survive.

Good Luck my objective friend.

2006-09-28 08:35:48 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I believe that for the most part abortion is wrong except in cases of incest or rape. There are many ways to protect yourself from pregnancy such as birth control. However if a person does find themselves pregnant with an unwanted child there are many loving couples who are unable to have children of their own. Some of these people are also willing to help with medical expenses. I just think that the child deserves a chance at life.

2006-09-28 04:18:00 · answer #2 · answered by shortandsexxy040182 1 · 3 0

I think we should give a chance for baby to be born. Human and animals alike.. nature have a way to control them (especially for animals). I don't have a pet atm, but there are a bunch of stray cats in my complex that help to control the rat population (and lizard, they sometimes eat them).

2016-03-18 02:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I personally wouldn't opt for abortion. My justifications are very simple & it has nothing to do with religion or science.

I am making a decision for an unborn child, who has a 'CHANCE' to be born into this world in a couple of months.

I can't change the past, but i think it woud be very selfish of me to take that 'CHANCE of life' away from that unborn child.

2006-09-28 05:37:09 · answer #4 · answered by someone 2 · 4 0

If the child was conceived in love, respect and honor you wouldn't want to destroy it. In your heart you know that you would not be here if your mom decided to abort you.....So you know that life begins when it begins. Science teaches that in all animals - Humans are animals.

Life begins and people who really don't love each other or themselves don't want a child that reminds them of their selfishness. It's just sex and you want to keep having sex with all it's freedom without the hassle of a child. So You Kill it and say Pro Choice.

If you were married - would you kill your husbands child. I think not. Think about it.

2006-09-28 09:05:31 · answer #5 · answered by Been There Done That 6 · 1 0

all i know is that its a personal choice. i cannot judge because i have a 10 year old daughter. i don't know what her sexual behaviour will be like in the next few years or so. as well, if she was raped, became pregnant, i would think an abortion would be the best option.

2006-09-28 05:02:54 · answer #6 · answered by havingfun 4 · 0 3

Abortion should be safe but rare.

Safe: (Modern, medical procedure in a sterile environment by licensed medical practicioners)

Rare: (It should not be used as a form of regular birth control. There should be no abortion industry, abortion clinics or doctors who specialize in abortion.)

Now, the trick is to make that happen. The difficulty is in the whole "supply and demand" issue, and the fact that it seems to cater to an unsavory crowd. i.e., there ARE plenty of doctors who are willing to be abortionists, and there ARE plenty of women who are willing to use it as a regular form of birth control.

It seems to be an indicator of many other problems in our society, doesn't it? No easy answers...

2006-09-28 10:18:06 · answer #7 · answered by roberticvs 4 · 0 2

The reason religion is rejected within such topics is because it is based on faith and intangible evidence. Therefore, any argument based on intangible evidence must be denied as well. That being said, once a child has all his vital organs, what tangible evidence proves the child is not human? What science proves they are less than us? What science proves they do not share the same rights as us?

2006-09-28 04:03:45 · answer #8 · answered by woman_of_tomorrow 2 · 1 1

OK WOW !!!! I am so pro choice ...being that I have trouble with pregnancy I think that I agree with an abortion with certain understanding ,,,what if you were raped would you be able to have a bond with that child ......so some are going to say what about adoption ..how can you give a child up for adoption when you will never know the medical back ground.....or what if you found out that the child was going to die right after being born would you want to put your self and other families through the pain and loss of a child when you could have something done before all got attached..........or how about if you had to choose between you or the child knowing that one would die....I have a daughter and I think I would have to pick my all ready living child ...I do not think it would be fair for her to lose a mother while I fought for a child knowing I was going to die she needs me !!!!!!thees are just coming from my point of view..........so under thees circumstances I would have to be pro choice ..I hope I never have to make the choice because it would be hard ......and for the people who up above me made the comment that an aborition is wrong that it is killing how can you explain your comment about killing the person who posted this ? (biggot)

2006-09-28 04:08:44 · answer #9 · answered by thunder_rainclouds 3 · 1 2

pro abortion. what others' choose for them is there own business. i expect the same courtesy

2006-09-28 04:04:33 · answer #10 · answered by el bastard sanchez 2 · 0 4

I am PRO-CHOICE!

2006-09-28 09:20:16 · answer #11 · answered by Mean Carleen 7 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers