English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

the Weapons of Mass Destruction and capture Sadaam Hussien??? Hello? what is that???
comments please??? omg..makes me so mad i was to beat our president up for that!!!!!

2006-09-28 03:39:01 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Ok is Afganisthan bigger than the US? and we are able to catch anyone here eventually ...why is it taking so long? hello????Cause we did not send enough troops to Afganisthan ok????

2006-09-28 03:50:46 · update #1

18 answers

Because Bush actually was obsessed with Iraq way before 9/11...he did nothing to find bin laden when he took office, and didn't see him as a threat, since he is good buddies with the bin laden family...he used 9/11 to invade Iraq and start a war that had nothing to do with bin laden...Saddam is a bastard but hated bin laden just as much as we do...this war actually made us less safe then more safe, instead of concentrating on defeating the terrorists he wanted to start this crap war with Iraq and we have seen how that went...we have no exit strategy, we are losing the war, and creating even more terrorists...Bush has done nothing but lie to the American people and killed more Americans than anyone with his war...way to go...oh Bush did you find those WMD's yet? Bush is a liar...he is the worst president in the history of the United States

2006-09-28 04:09:10 · answer #1 · answered by Voicekiller 4 · 2 2

Okay, you've obviously been getting your news from CNN also. Have you ever heard of Afghanistan? It's this place all the way on the other side of the world. I know that's hard to believe, but there are places other than the Middle East; the media just doesn't want you to know about them. Anyway, that's where we looked for and are still looking for Bin Laden.

You must think Afghanistan has social security numbers and things like that attached to Bin Laden. Do you have any idea how hard it would actually be to find him?

2006-09-28 03:43:38 · answer #2 · answered by ♥ady_8e_80♥ 4 · 2 3

Settle down and take a xanax for krissakes.

Wars can be fought on more than one front, you know. You'll see that he'll be killed one day.

Do you even KNOW what you're mad at?

You know what I think? I think you don't have a clue. I think that you're just parroting something you heard in study hall or in the hallways between classes.

You don't have a single clue what reality is. You know trendy things. Fads. Right now, dissing the President is the "in" thing.

Grow up. When you are old enough to vote, then you can join the adults in doing their duty.

2006-09-28 03:44:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

That was actually a couple of years after 9/11. There was this War in Afghanistan first. The country where Bin Ladin lived.

2006-09-28 03:40:43 · answer #4 · answered by MEL T 7 · 7 3

FER real. What terrorist could Saddam support?????? Even IRAN would have been a better choice as they OPENLY support groups the US deems as terrorist and have more $$$$$ than IRAQ.

I heard once on a news program that Iraq was suppose to be the easy take down, the example to the rest of the rogue states. It was the BEST reason I've heard so far.

WE FAILED!!!!!!!

I think Bush's problem is that he believe that hype of America (being a super power and all) but hasnt' realized the rest of the world is catching up and money and power don't make good warriors...DESPERATION and DISCIPLINE and FAITH do and the terrorist have those things in SPADES!!!!!

2006-09-28 03:48:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

NOPE! quite, you could factor your finger at bill Clinton. decrease back whilst he replace into president, he replace into exceeded Bin weighted down on a silver platter, in easy terms bill replace into too busy taking part in golfing to end and sign the order. for effective, Bin weighted down have been given away and concealed interior the hills of Afghanistan. That replace into our ONE and in easy terms risk at a sparkling shot on Bin weighted down. As bill left place of work, he whispered into George's ear that Bin weighted down replace right into a danger. Now on account that 911 Bush has spent a fortune bribing informants to capture Bin weighted down. despite the fact that Bush has controlled to take out a number of Bin weighted down's perfect hand adult men, we've in no way gotten Bin weighted down himself. there replace into all over back that we fantastically much had him, however the operation had to be aborted on the final minute, simply by fact of inadequate adult men. hi! that's no longer precisely like a map quest adventure going after Bin weighted down. the guy is consistently shifting from one cave to a distinctive to evade capture. it could be like attempting to discover a needle in a haystack that replace into being tossed around. for this reason, we are looking for for one guy interior the mountains of Afghanistan, style of impossible. So, my chum, that's no longer Bush it extremely is a failure, yet particularly Clinton, who did no longer grab the 2d, whilst he replace into the president. all of us know what Bush might do and all of us know what Clinton did no longer do. My question to you is what might Obama do with Bin weighted down, if he had the prospect? no longer plenty!

2016-12-12 16:43:21 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

That is the $64,000 question sweet gal. I suggest you rent Fahrenheit 911, you will learn that the Bin Ladens are a wealthy Saudi family with many ties to the Bushes, and the truths about the Bush dynasty's sick obsession with Iraq.

2006-09-28 03:50:36 · answer #7 · answered by Lee 7 · 1 4

Wow are you misinformed or just stupid?

We went after Bin laden first in Afghanistan October 7 2001.

We didn't go into Iraq until 2003 because they are supporters of terrorism.

Ignorant fools like you make me want to beat up your parents.

2006-09-28 03:57:30 · answer #8 · answered by Bill 3 · 4 3

The attacks were a wonderful excuse for GWB to finish what his daddy couldn't (which was getting Saddamm out of power) WMD were a great way to excuse the invasion, and who cares if it was proved wrong...He knew once he got himself (or should I say our troops) in there there would be no way anyone could force him to get out. He is a war monger bully. I agree we need TO END terrorism, but it is like beating a child for hitting, what is it teaching? ALthough done throgh lies, Saddamm needed to be removed, it has been a catch 22, he's is almost out, all we can do at this point IS VOTE and make our voices heard. It is fine to sit on our computers and pound out our opinions on the keyboard but it does no good, the average citizen has to become PROACTIVE.

2006-09-28 03:45:33 · answer #9 · answered by Jep 3 · 4 4

What a liberal mess your life is. You want to beat up someone who spends all of his time protecting you, you think it is ok to destroy babies but not terrorists and you don't know anything about saddam's crimes and that our troops are still looking for bin lauden's dead body.

I will pray for you that one day you will see the truth and put away all that anger. Please read John 3:16 before liberalism melts your mind completely!

2006-09-28 03:49:01 · answer #10 · answered by buffman316 2 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers